Col*_*mbo 27
<笑话>显然,postfix-increment最终显示了它的副作用</ joke>
我想负责发表这篇文章的人必须写错字,因为提到它的每个其他来源都使用ISO/IEC 14882:201 4,标题后面的文字也是如此:
ISO/IEC 14882:2014规定了C++编程语言实现的要求.
Also consider this passage from "We have C++14!":
We will perform some final editorial tweaks, on the order of fixing a few spelling typos and accidentally dropped words, and then transmit the document to ISO for publication this year as the brand new International Standard ISO/IEC 14882:2014(E) Programming Language C++, a.k.a. C++14.
C++14 was ratified in 2014, hence the name. However, if the publication did only happen this January - i.e. in 2015 - then there is a chance that this is more than just a typo. Then the name ISO/IEC 14882:2014 was mentioned solely in anticipation of the publishing still happening in 2014.
According to Wikipedia,
这些是使用格式ISO [/ IEC] [/ ASTM] [IS] nnnnn [-p]:[yyyy]标题指定的,其中nnnnn是标准的编号, p是可选的部件编号,yyyy是发布的年份,标题描述了主题.
虽然标准文件的正式名称确实将在2015年作为出版年度更正,但我们仍然称之为C++ 14,因为去年基本建立了最终文件(也因为引入了"C++ 15")在这一点上会引起很多刺激,就像ISO C89/C90一样).