Ark*_*rkh 75
具有200k随机记录的小基准.正如所料,fetchAll方法更快但需要更多内存.
Result :
fetchAll : 0.35965991020203s, 100249408b
fetch : 0.39197015762329s, 440b
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
使用的基准代码:
<?php
// First benchmark : speed
$dbh = new PDO('mysql:dbname=testage;dbhost=localhost', 'root', '');
$dbh->setAttribute(PDO::ATTR_ERRMODE, PDO::ERRMODE_EXCEPTION);
$sql = 'SELECT * FROM test_table WHERE 1';
$stmt = $dbh->query($sql);
$data = array();
$start_all = microtime(true);
$data = $stmt->fetchAll();
$end_all = microtime(true);
$stmt = $dbh->query($sql);
$data = array();
$start_one = microtime(true);
while($data = $stmt->fetch()){}
$end_one = microtime(true);
// Second benchmark : memory usage
$stmt = $dbh->query($sql);
$data = array();
$memory_start_all = memory_get_usage();
$data = $stmt->fetchAll();
$memory_end_all = memory_get_usage();
$stmt = $dbh->query($sql);
$data = array();
$memory_end_one = 0;
$memory_start_one = memory_get_usage();
while($data = $stmt->fetch()){
$memory_end_one = max($memory_end_one, memory_get_usage());
}
echo 'Result : <br/>
fetchAll : ' . ($end_all - $start_all) . 's, ' . ($memory_end_all - $memory_start_all) . 'b<br/>
fetch : ' . ($end_one - $start_one) . 's, ' . ($memory_end_one - $memory_start_one) . 'b<br/>';
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Ken*_*ins 10
关于PHP的一件事,我发现它几乎总是真的是你自己实现的函数几乎总是比PHP等效的慢.这是因为当在PHP中实现某些东西时,它没有C所具有的所有编译时优化(编写PHP),并且PHP函数调用的开销很高.
小智 9
@Arkh
// $data in this case is an array of rows;
$data = $stmt->fetchAll();
// $data in this case is just one row after each loop;
while($data = $stmt->fetch()){}
// Try using
$i = 0;
while($data[$i++] = $stmt->fetch()){}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
记忆差异应该变得可以忽略不计
测量"内存占用"的所有基准实际上都是不正确的,原因很简单.
默认情况下,PDO会将所有内容加载到内存中,如果使用fetch或fetchAll则无关紧要.要真正获得无缓冲查询的好处,您应该指示PDO使用无缓冲的查询:
$db->setAttribute(PDO::MYSQL_ATTR_USE_BUFFERED_QUERY, false);
在这种情况下,您将看到脚本的内存占用量存在巨大差异
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
78853 次 |
| 最近记录: |