我需要实现我自己的结构类型擦除包装,非常相似SequenceOf,GeneratorOf等于是我开始试图通过刚刚重新实现标准的SequenceOf自己.
我只是复制并粘贴了声明SequenceOf,重命名为MySequenceOf,并填写了一些存根来获取:
/// A type-erased sequence.
///
/// Forwards operations to an arbitrary underlying sequence with the
/// same `Element` type, hiding the specifics of the underlying
/// sequence type.
///
/// See also: `GeneratorOf<T>`.
struct MySequenceOf<T> : SequenceType {
/// Construct an instance whose `generate()` method forwards to
/// `makeUnderlyingGenerator`
init<G : GeneratorType where T == T>(_ makeUnderlyingGenerator: () -> G) {
fatalError("implement me")
}
/// Construct an instance whose `generate()` method forwards to
/// that of `base`.
init<S : SequenceType where T == T>(_ base: S) {
fatalError("implement me")
}
/// Return a *generator* over the elements of this *sequence*.
///
/// Complexity: O(1)
func generate() -> GeneratorOf<T> {
fatalError("implement me")
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我得到编译器错误:" 同类型中的任何一种类型都不是指泛型参数或关联类型 ".所以我假设Xcode生成的SequenceOf's" where T == T"约束声明真的意思是" where G.Element == T",这给了我以下可编译的结构:
struct MySequenceOf<T> : SequenceType {
init<G : GeneratorType where G.Element == T>(_ makeUnderlyingGenerator: () -> G) {
fatalError("implement me")
}
func generate() -> GeneratorOf<T> {
fatalError("implement me")
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
所以现在,很简单,我只需makeUnderlyingGenerator要从初始化程序中继续并从generate()以下位置调用它:
struct MySequenceOf<T> : SequenceType {
let maker: ()->GeneratorOf<T>
init<G : GeneratorType where G.Element == T>(_ makeUnderlyingGenerator: () -> G) {
self.maker = { return makeUnderlyingGenerator() }
}
func generate() -> GeneratorOf<T> {
return self.maker()
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但这给了我错误:" 'G'不能转换为'GeneratorOf' "
如果我强制演员,它会编译:
struct MySequenceOf<T> : SequenceType {
let maker: ()->GeneratorOf<T>
init<G : GeneratorType where G.Element == T>(_ makeUnderlyingGenerator: () -> G) {
self.maker = { return makeUnderlyingGenerator() as GeneratorOf<T> }
}
func generate() -> GeneratorOf<T> {
return self.maker()
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但是它在运行时从动态转换中崩溃了.
那么如何实现这样的类型擦除呢?它必须是可能的,因为Swift标准库做了很多(SequenceOf,GeneratorOf,SinkOf).
尝试:
struct MySequenceOf<T> : SequenceType {
private let _generate:() -> MyGeneratorOf<T>
init<G : GeneratorType where G.Element == T>(_ makeUnderlyingGenerator: () -> G) {
_generate = { MyGeneratorOf(makeUnderlyingGenerator()) }
}
init<S : SequenceType where S.Generator.Element == T>(_ base: S) {
_generate = { MyGeneratorOf(base.generate()) }
}
func generate() -> MyGeneratorOf<T> {
return _generate()
}
}
struct MyGeneratorOf<T> : GeneratorType, SequenceType {
private let _next:() -> T?
init(_ nextElement: () -> T?) {
_next = nextElement
}
init<G : GeneratorType where G.Element == T>(var _ base: G) {
_next = { base.next() }
}
mutating func next() -> T? {
return _next()
}
func generate() -> MyGeneratorOf<T> {
return self
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
实施的基本策略ProtocolOf<T>是这样的:
protocol ProtocolType {
typealias Value
func methodA() -> Value
func methodB(arg:Value) -> Bool
}
struct ProtocolOf<T>:ProtocolType {
private let _methodA: () -> T
private let _methodB: (T) -> Bool
init<B:ProtocolType where B.Value == T>(_ base:B) {
_methodA = { base.methodA() }
_methodB = { base.methodB($0) }
}
func methodA() -> T { return _methodA() }
func methodB(arg:T) -> Bool { return _methodB(arg) }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
添加到评论中回答@MartinR.
是否有一个特殊的原因,即_generate是一个闭包而不是发电机本身?
首先,我认为,这是规范或语义的问题.
不用说,不同之处在于"何时创建发电机".
考虑以下代码:
class Foo:SequenceType {
var vals:[Int] = [1,2,3]
func generate() -> Array<Int>.Generator {
return vals.generate()
}
}
let foo = Foo()
let seq = MySequenceOf(foo)
foo.vals = [4,5,6]
let result = Array(seq)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
问题是:result应该[1,2,3]还是[4,5,6]?我MySequenceOf和内置的SequenceOf结果是后者.我只是将行为与内置行为相匹配.
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
1041 次 |
| 最近记录: |