C#linq order by和foreach的其他语句,是否有性能差异？

Question

我正在使用实体框架,集合以及那里的usting where-conditions和order by actions进行编程.我一直在问这个问题,但从来没有弄明白.

假设我已经得到了两段代码;

例1:

// An unsorted string array.
string[] letters = { "d", "c", "a", "b" };
// Use LINQ query syntax to sort the array alphabetically.
var sorted = from letter in letters
         orderby letter
         select letter;

// Loop with the foreach keyword.
foreach (string value in sorted)
{
    Console.WriteLine(value);
}

例2:

// An unsorted string array.
string[] letters = { "d", "c", "a", "b" };

// Loop with the foreach keyword.
foreach (string val in letters.OrderBy(l => l))
{
    console.writeline(val)
}

第一个示例首先对结果集执行order by,然后在我们要迭代它的那一刻迭代第二个具有顺序的集合.现在真正的问题我一直想知道......性能有什么不同(如果有的话)？并且两种方法中的一种比另一种更好吗？与conditons(简单和复杂的连接)相同,是否有任何明显的区别？

Answer 1

两者没有区别。。

代码 -

static void Main(string[] args)
{
    string[] letters = { "d", "c", "a", "b" };
    // Use LINQ query syntax to sort the array alphabetically.
    var sorted = from letter in letters
                    orderby letter
                    select letter;

    // Loop with the foreach keyword.
    foreach (string value in sorted)
    {
        Console.WriteLine(value);
    }

    foreach (string val in letters.OrderBy(letter => letter))
    {
        Console.WriteLine(val);
    }
}

生成的代码 -

private static void Main(string[] args)
{
  string[] strArray1 = new string[4]
  {
    "d",
    "c",
    "a",
    "b"
  };
  string[] strArray2 = strArray1;
  if (Program.CS\u0024\u003C\u003E9__CachedAnonymousMethodDelegate2 == null)
  {
    // ISSUE: method pointer
    Program.CS\u0024\u003C\u003E9__CachedAnonymousMethodDelegate2 = new Func<string, string>((object) null, __methodptr(\u003CMain\u003Eb__0));
  }
  Func<string, string> keySelector1 = Program.CS\u0024\u003C\u003E9__CachedAnonymousMethodDelegate2;
  foreach (string str in (IEnumerable<string>) Enumerable.OrderBy<string, string>((IEnumerable<string>) strArray2, keySelector1))
    Console.WriteLine(str);
  string[] strArray3 = strArray1;
  if (Program.CS\u0024\u003C\u003E9__CachedAnonymousMethodDelegate3 == null)
  {
    // ISSUE: method pointer
    Program.CS\u0024\u003C\u003E9__CachedAnonymousMethodDelegate3 = new Func<string, string>((object) null, __methodptr(\u003CMain\u003Eb__1));
  }
  Func<string, string> keySelector2 = Program.CS\u0024\u003C\u003E9__CachedAnonymousMethodDelegate3;
  foreach (string str in (IEnumerable<string>) Enumerable.OrderBy<string, string>((IEnumerable<string>) strArray3, keySelector2))
    Console.WriteLine(str);
}

[CompilerGenerated]
private static string \u003CMain\u003Eb__0(string letter)
{
  return letter;
}

[CompilerGenerated]
private static string \u003CMain\u003Eb__1(string letter)
{
  return letter;
}

编辑： 这是我很想尝试的一个有趣的变体.. 在上面的例子中，对于查询表达式，编译器足够聪明，可以优化Select离开.. 但是，如果在第二个变体中，我们添加了一个显式的Select. 这并不奇怪，但编译器仍然没有优化显式.Select（与Select查询表达式中的显式相比- 编译器的要求）。

代码 -

    foreach (string val in letters.OrderBy(letter => letter).Select(letter => letter))
    {
        Console.WriteLine(val);
    }

生成的代码 -

  string[] strArray4 = strArray1;
  if (Program.CS\u0024\u003C\u003E9__CachedAnonymousMethodDelegate6 == null)
  {
    // ISSUE: method pointer
    Program.CS\u0024\u003C\u003E9__CachedAnonymousMethodDelegate6 = new Func<string, string>((object) null, __methodptr(\u003CMain\u003Eb__2));
  }
  Func<string, string> keySelector3 = Program.CS\u0024\u003C\u003E9__CachedAnonymousMethodDelegate6;
  IOrderedEnumerable<string> orderedEnumerable = Enumerable.OrderBy<string, string>((IEnumerable<string>) strArray4, keySelector3);
  if (Program.CS\u0024\u003C\u003E9__CachedAnonymousMethodDelegate7 == null)
  {
    // ISSUE: method pointer
    Program.CS\u0024\u003C\u003E9__CachedAnonymousMethodDelegate7 = new Func<string, string>((object) null, __methodptr(\u003CMain\u003Eb__3));
  }
  Func<string, string> selector = Program.CS\u0024\u003C\u003E9__CachedAnonymousMethodDelegate7;
  foreach (string str in Enumerable.Select<string, string>((IEnumerable<string>) orderedEnumerable, selector))
    Console.WriteLine(str);