wor*_*tor 6 scala producer-consumer actor akka
我尝试在scala中实现Producer Consumer程序而不使用Queue.因为我认为Actor已经实现了"邮件队列"或其他东西,所以再次编写代码将是多余的.
我试图纯粹在Actor中编写程序.以下是多生产者多个消费者计划.制片人睡了一会儿,模拟做某事.消费者根本不睡觉.
但是我不知道如果我没有添加监督者演员来监视消费者,如何关闭程序,以及使用"Await"(代码中的监督者类)的Promise对象
反正有没有摆脱他们?
import akka.actor.Actor.Receive
import akka.actor._
import akka.routing._;
import akka.util._
import scala.concurrent.{Await, Promise}
import scala.concurrent.duration._
class Producer(val pool:ActorRef)(val name:String) extends Actor {
def receive = {
case _ =>
while (true) {
val sleepTime = scala.util.Random.nextInt(1000)
Thread.sleep(sleepTime)
println("Producer %s send food" format name)
pool ! name
}
}
}
class Consumer(supervisor : ActorRef)(val name:String) extends Actor {
var counter = 0
def receive = {
case s =>
counter += 1
println("%s eat food produced by %s" format (name,s))
if (counter >= 10) {
println("%s is full" format name)
context.stop(self)
supervisor ! 1
}
}
}
class Supervisor(p:Promise[String]) extends Actor {
var r = 3
def receive = {
case _ =>
r -= 1
if (0 == r) {
println("All consumer stopped")
context.stop(self)
p success ("Good")
}
}
}
object Try3 {
def work(): Unit = {
val system = ActorSystem("sys1")
val nProducer = 5;
val nConsumer = 3;
val p = Promise[String]
val supervisor = system.actorOf(Props(new Supervisor(p)));
val arrConsumer = for ( i <- 1 to nConsumer) yield system.actorOf( Props( new Consumer(supervisor)( "Consumer %d" format (i) ) ) )
val poolConsumer = system.actorOf(Props.empty.withRouter( RoundRobinRouter(arrConsumer) ))
val arrProducer = for ( i <- 1 to nProducer) yield system.actorOf( Props( new Producer(poolConsumer)( "Producer %d" format (i) ) ) )
arrProducer foreach (_ ! "start")
Await.result(p.future,Duration.Inf)
println("great!")
system.shutdown
}
def main(args:Array[String]): Unit = {
work()
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
接收函数Producer类有一个问题,它不会被关闭,因为它没有中断条件.
我能想到的唯一方法是"向生产者本身发送信息".我想知道这是实现这种请求的正常方式吗?
这是修改后的代码:
class Producer(val pool:ActorRef)(val name:String) extends Actor {
// original implementation:
// def receive = {
// case _ =>
// while (true){
// val sleepTime = scala.util.Random.nextInt(1000)
// Thread.sleep(sleepTime)
// println("Producer %s send food" format name)
// pool ! name
// }
// }
case object Loop;
def receive = {
case _ =>
val sleepTime = scala.util.Random.nextInt(1000)
Thread.sleep(sleepTime)
println("Producer %s send food" format name)
pool ! name
self ! Loop //send message to itself
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
无论我的实现如何,使用Actor或Future/Promise在scala中实现Producer Consumer程序的正确方法是什么?
您永远不应该在演员内部阻塞(在您的情况下为 Thread.sleep,while 循环)。Actor 内部的阻塞会从所有 Actor 之间使用的线程池中占用一个线程。即使像您这样的少量 Producer 也会使 ActorSystem 中的所有 Actor 失去线程并使它们无法使用。
相反,使用 aScheduler来安排在 Producer 中定期发送消息。
override def preStart(): Unit = {
import scala.concurrent.duration._
import context.dispatcher
context.system.scheduler.schedule(
initialDelay = 0.seconds,
interval = 1.second,
receiver = pool,
message = name
)
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
3260 次 |
| 最近记录: |