我一直无法找到合理的实现,JsonConvert.WriteJson这允许我在序列化特定类型时插入JSON属性.我的所有尝试都导致"JsonSerializationException:使用类型XXX检测到自引用循环".
关于我正在尝试解决的问题的更多背景:我使用JSON作为配置文件格式,我使用a JsonConverter来控制我的配置类型的类型解析,序列化和反序列化.$type我想使用更有意义的JSON值来解决正确的类型,而不是使用属性.
在我的简化示例中,这是一些JSON文本:
{
"Target": "B",
"Id": "foo"
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
其中JSON属性"Target": "B"用于确定此对象应序列化为类型B.考虑到这个简单的例子,这种设计似乎并不那么引人注目,但它确实使配置文件格式更加有用.
我还希望配置文件是可循环访问的.我有反序列化的工作,我无法工作的是序列化案例.
我的问题的根源是我找不到JsonConverter.WriteJson使用标准JSON序列化逻辑的实现,并且不会抛出"自引用循环"异常.这是我的实现:
public override void WriteJson(JsonWriter writer, object value, JsonSerializer serializer)
{
JProperty typeHintProperty = TypeHintPropertyForType(value.GetType());
//BUG: JsonSerializationException : Self referencing loop detected with type 'B'. Path ''.
// Same error occurs whether I use the serializer parameter or a separate serializer.
JObject jo = JObject.FromObject(value, serializer);
if (typeHintProperty != null)
{
jo.AddFirst(typeHintProperty);
}
writer.WriteToken(jo.CreateReader());
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
在我看来,这是Json.NET中的一个错误,因为应该有办法做到这一点.不幸的是JsonConverter.WriteJson,我遇到的所有示例(例如,JSON.NET中特定对象的自定义转换)仅提供特定类的自定义序列化,使用JsonWriter方法写出单个对象和属性.
这是展示我的问题的xunit测试的完整代码(或在此处查看)
using System;
using Newtonsoft.Json;
using Newtonsoft.Json.Linq;
using Newtonsoft.Json.Serialization;
using Xunit;
public class A
{
public string Id { get; set; }
public A Child { get; set; }
}
public class B : A {}
public class C : A {}
/// <summary>
/// Shows the problem I'm having serializing classes with Json.
/// </summary>
public sealed class JsonTypeConverterProblem
{
[Fact]
public void ShowSerializationBug()
{
A a = new B()
{
Id = "foo",
Child = new C() { Id = "bar" }
};
JsonSerializerSettings jsonSettings = new JsonSerializerSettings();
jsonSettings.ContractResolver = new TypeHintContractResolver();
string json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(a, Formatting.Indented, jsonSettings);
Console.WriteLine(json);
Assert.Contains(@"""Target"": ""B""", json);
Assert.Contains(@"""Is"": ""C""", json);
}
[Fact]
public void DeserializationWorks()
{
string json =
@"{
""Target"": ""B"",
""Id"": ""foo"",
""Child"": {
""Is"": ""C"",
""Id"": ""bar"",
}
}";
JsonSerializerSettings jsonSettings = new JsonSerializerSettings();
jsonSettings.ContractResolver = new TypeHintContractResolver();
A a = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<A>(json, jsonSettings);
Assert.IsType<B>(a);
Assert.IsType<C>(a.Child);
}
}
public class TypeHintContractResolver : DefaultContractResolver
{
public override JsonContract ResolveContract(Type type)
{
JsonContract contract = base.ResolveContract(type);
if ((contract is JsonObjectContract)
&& ((type == typeof(A)) || (type == typeof(B))) ) // In the real implementation, this is checking against a registry of types
{
contract.Converter = new TypeHintJsonConverter(type);
}
return contract;
}
}
public class TypeHintJsonConverter : JsonConverter
{
private readonly Type _declaredType;
public TypeHintJsonConverter(Type declaredType)
{
_declaredType = declaredType;
}
public override bool CanConvert(Type objectType)
{
return objectType == _declaredType;
}
// The real implementation of the next 2 methods uses reflection on concrete types to determine the declaredType hint.
// TypeFromTypeHint and TypeHintPropertyForType are the inverse of each other.
private Type TypeFromTypeHint(JObject jo)
{
if (new JValue("B").Equals(jo["Target"]))
{
return typeof(B);
}
else if (new JValue("A").Equals(jo["Hint"]))
{
return typeof(A);
}
else if (new JValue("C").Equals(jo["Is"]))
{
return typeof(C);
}
else
{
throw new ArgumentException("Type not recognized from JSON");
}
}
private JProperty TypeHintPropertyForType(Type type)
{
if (type == typeof(A))
{
return new JProperty("Hint", "A");
}
else if (type == typeof(B))
{
return new JProperty("Target", "B");
}
else if (type == typeof(C))
{
return new JProperty("Is", "C");
}
else
{
return null;
}
}
public override object ReadJson(JsonReader reader, Type objectType, object existingValue, JsonSerializer serializer)
{
if (! CanConvert(objectType))
{
throw new InvalidOperationException("Can't convert declaredType " + objectType + "; expected " + _declaredType);
}
// Load JObject from stream. Turns out we're also called for null arrays of our objects,
// so handle a null by returning one.
var jToken = JToken.Load(reader);
if (jToken.Type == JTokenType.Null)
return null;
if (jToken.Type != JTokenType.Object)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException("Json: expected " + _declaredType + "; got " + jToken.Type);
}
JObject jObject = (JObject) jToken;
// Select the declaredType based on TypeHint
Type deserializingType = TypeFromTypeHint(jObject);
var target = Activator.CreateInstance(deserializingType);
serializer.Populate(jObject.CreateReader(), target);
return target;
}
public override bool CanWrite
{
get { return true; }
}
public override void WriteJson(JsonWriter writer, object value, JsonSerializer serializer)
{
JProperty typeHintProperty = TypeHintPropertyForType(value.GetType());
//BUG: JsonSerializationException : Self referencing loop detected with type 'B'. Path ''.
// Same error occurs whether I use the serializer parameter or a separate serializer.
JObject jo = JObject.FromObject(value, serializer);
if (typeHintProperty != null)
{
jo.AddFirst(typeHintProperty);
}
writer.WriteToken(jo.CreateReader());
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Bri*_*ers 14
JObject.FromObject()正如您所看到的,从转换器内对正在转换的同一对象进行调用将导致递归循环.通常解决方案是(a)在转换器中使用单独的JsonSerializer实例,或者(b)手动序列化属性,正如James在他的回答中指出的那样.您的情况有点特别,因为这些解决方案都不适合您:如果您使用不了解转换器的单独序列化程序实例,那么您的子对象将不会应用其提示属性.正如您在评论中提到的那样,完全手动序列化不适用于通用解决方案.
幸运的是,有一个中间立场.您可以在WriteJson方法中使用一些反射来获取对象属性,然后从那里委托JToken.FromObject().转换器将像子属性一样递归调用,但不会为当前对象调用,因此您不会遇到麻烦.这个解决方案的一个警告:如果您碰巧将任何[JsonProperty]属性应用于此转换器处理的类(在您的示例中为A,B和C),则不会遵循这些属性.
以下是该WriteJson方法的更新代码:
public override void WriteJson(JsonWriter writer, object value, JsonSerializer serializer)
{
JProperty typeHintProperty = TypeHintPropertyForType(value.GetType());
JObject jo = new JObject();
if (typeHintProperty != null)
{
jo.Add(typeHintProperty);
}
foreach (PropertyInfo prop in value.GetType().GetProperties())
{
if (prop.CanRead)
{
object propValue = prop.GetValue(value);
if (propValue != null)
{
jo.Add(prop.Name, JToken.FromObject(propValue, serializer));
}
}
}
jo.WriteTo(writer);
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
小提琴:https://dotnetfiddle.net/jQrxb8
使用自定义转换器获取我们忽略的属性的示例,将其分解并将其属性添加到其父对象:
public class ContextBaseSerializer : JsonConverter
{
public override bool CanConvert(Type objectType)
{
return typeof(ContextBase).GetTypeInfo().IsAssignableFrom(objectType);
}
public override object ReadJson(JsonReader reader, Type objectType, object existingValue, JsonSerializer serializer)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
public override void WriteJson(JsonWriter writer, object value, JsonSerializer serializer)
{
var contextBase = value as ContextBase;
var valueToken = JToken.FromObject(value, new ForcedObjectSerializer());
if (contextBase.Properties != null)
{
var propertiesToken = JToken.FromObject(contextBase.Properties);
foreach (var property in propertiesToken.Children<JProperty>())
{
valueToken[property.Name] = property.Value;
}
}
valueToken.WriteTo(writer);
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我们必须覆盖序列化程序,以便我们指定自定义解析器:
public class ForcedObjectSerializer : JsonSerializer
{
public ForcedObjectSerializer()
: base()
{
this.ContractResolver = new ForcedObjectResolver();
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
在自定义解析器中,我们将从JsonContract中删除转换器,这将强制内部序列化程序使用默认对象序列化程序:
public class ForcedObjectResolver : DefaultContractResolver
{
public override JsonContract ResolveContract(Type type)
{
// We're going to null the converter to force it to serialize this as a plain object.
var contract = base.ResolveContract(type);
contract.Converter = null;
return contract;
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这应该会让你在那里,或足够接近.:)我在https://github.com/RoushTech/SegmentDotNet/中使用它,其中包含覆盖此用例的测试用例(包括嵌套我们的自定义序列化类),详细讨论内容如下:https://github.com /JamesNK/Newtonsoft.Json/issues/386
序列化器正在调用您的转换器,然后转换器再调用正在调用您的转换器的序列化器,等等。
使用没有 JObject.FromObject 转换器的序列化程序的新实例,或者手动序列化类型的成员。
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
9210 次 |
| 最近记录: |