有没有办法简化这个流表达式?

Pan*_*lak 4 java arrays java-8 java-stream

protected static String paramsAsString(Object[] args) {
    return Arrays.stream(args).map((o) -> o != null && o.getClass().isArray() ? ArrayUtils.toString(o) : o)
            .collect(Collectors.toList()).toString();
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

单元测试

public void paramsAsString() throws Exception {
    String[] strings = {"1" , "2"};
    int[] ints = {3,4};
    int[] intsEmpty = {3,4};
    Object[] args = {"aaa" ,"zzz" , ints , strings, intsEmpty, null};
    String paramsAsString = paramsAsString(args);
    assertEquals("[aaa, zzz, {3,4}, {1,2}, {3,4}, null]", paramsAsString);
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我只是在学习流API.我想知道有没有办法简化这个流表达式并删除复杂的if?

gon*_*ard 5

如果您只是引用ArrayUtils::toString,则避免使用条件:

protected static String paramsAsString(Object[] args) {
    return Arrays.stream(args)
                 .map(ArrayUtils::toString)
                 .collect(Collectors.toList()).toString();
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

但是你得到的测试失败了:

[aaa, zzz, {3,4}, {1,2}, {3,4}, {}]

代替

[aaa, zzz, {3,4}, {1,2}, {3,4}, null]

你可以用正则表达式"破解"这个:

 return Arrays.stream(args)
              .map(ArrayUtils::toString)
              .collect(Collectors.toList())
              .toString().replaceAll("\\{\\}" , "null");
 }
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

但就个人而言,我会保留条件并将lambda转换为另一种实用方法:

public class MyArrayUtils {
     protected static String paramsAsString(Object[] args) {
         return Arrays.stream(args)
                      .map(MyArrayUtils::objectToString)
                      .collect(Collectors.toList()).toString();
     }

     private static String objectToString(Object object) {
         return object == null ? null : ArrayUtils.toString(object);
     }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)