Who*_*Who 52 python subprocess callback exit
我正在推出一个使用的程序 subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell=TRUE)
我对Python很新,但感觉就像应该有一些api让我做类似的事情:
subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell=TRUE, postexec_fn=function_to_call_on_exit)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我这样做是为了function_to_call_on_exit
能够在知道cmd退出的基础上做一些事情(例如保持当前正在运行的外部进程数的计数)
我假设我可以相当简单地将子进程包装在一个将线程与Popen.wait()
方法结合起来的类中,但是因为我还没有在Python中进行线程化,而且看起来这可能是一个常见的API存在,我想我会先尝试找一个.
提前致谢 :)
Dan*_*l G 61
你是对的 - 没有很好的API.你的第二点也是对的 - 设计一个使用线程为你做这个功能的功能非常简单.
import threading
import subprocess
def popenAndCall(onExit, popenArgs):
"""
Runs the given args in a subprocess.Popen, and then calls the function
onExit when the subprocess completes.
onExit is a callable object, and popenArgs is a list/tuple of args that
would give to subprocess.Popen.
"""
def runInThread(onExit, popenArgs):
proc = subprocess.Popen(*popenArgs)
proc.wait()
onExit()
return
thread = threading.Thread(target=runInThread, args=(onExit, popenArgs))
thread.start()
# returns immediately after the thread starts
return thread
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
在Python中,即使线程也很容易,但请注意,如果onExit()的计算成本很高,那么你需要将它放在一个单独的进程中,而不是使用多处理(这样GIL不会减慢你的程序速度).它实际上非常简单 - 你基本上只需要替换所有的调用threading.Thread
,multiprocessing.Process
因为它们遵循(几乎)相同的API.
jfs*_*jfs 16
concurrent.futures
Python 3.2中有模块(可pip install futures
用于较旧的Python <3.2):
pool = Pool(max_workers=1)
f = pool.submit(subprocess.call, "sleep 2; echo done", shell=True)
f.add_done_callback(callback)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
回调将在调用的同一进程中调用f.add_done_callback()
.
import logging
import subprocess
# to install run `pip install futures` on Python <3.2
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor as Pool
info = logging.getLogger(__name__).info
def callback(future):
if future.exception() is not None:
info("got exception: %s" % future.exception())
else:
info("process returned %d" % future.result())
def main():
logging.basicConfig(
level=logging.INFO,
format=("%(relativeCreated)04d %(process)05d %(threadName)-10s "
"%(levelname)-5s %(msg)s"))
# wait for the process completion asynchronously
info("begin waiting")
pool = Pool(max_workers=1)
f = pool.submit(subprocess.call, "sleep 2; echo done", shell=True)
f.add_done_callback(callback)
pool.shutdown(wait=False) # no .submit() calls after that point
info("continue waiting asynchronously")
if __name__=="__main__":
main()
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
$ python . && python3 .
0013 05382 MainThread INFO begin waiting
0021 05382 MainThread INFO continue waiting asynchronously
done
2025 05382 Thread-1 INFO process returned 0
0007 05402 MainThread INFO begin waiting
0014 05402 MainThread INFO continue waiting asynchronously
done
2018 05402 Thread-1 INFO process returned 0
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Phi*_*hil 12
我修改了Daniel G的答案,简单地传递subprocess.Popen args和kwargs作为自己而不是单独的tupple/list,因为我想在subprocess.Popen中使用关键字参数.
在我的情况下,我有一个postExec()
我想追求的方法subprocess.Popen('exe', cwd=WORKING_DIR)
使用下面的代码,它就变成了 popenAndCall(postExec, 'exe', cwd=WORKING_DIR)
import threading
import subprocess
def popenAndCall(onExit, *popenArgs, **popenKWArgs):
"""
Runs a subprocess.Popen, and then calls the function onExit when the
subprocess completes.
Use it exactly the way you'd normally use subprocess.Popen, except include a
callable to execute as the first argument. onExit is a callable object, and
*popenArgs and **popenKWArgs are simply passed up to subprocess.Popen.
"""
def runInThread(onExit, popenArgs, popenKWArgs):
proc = subprocess.Popen(*popenArgs, **popenKWArgs)
proc.wait()
onExit()
return
thread = threading.Thread(target=runInThread,
args=(onExit, popenArgs, popenKWArgs))
thread.start()
return thread # returns immediately after the thread starts
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我有同样的问题,并使用解决了它multiprocessing.Pool
.涉及两个hacky技巧:
result是在完成时使用回调执行的一个函数
def sub(arg):
print arg #prints [1,2,3,4,5]
return "hello"
def cb(arg):
print arg # prints "hello"
pool = multiprocessing.Pool(1)
rval = pool.map_async(sub,([[1,2,3,4,5]]),callback =cb)
(do stuff)
pool.close()
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
就我而言,我希望调用也是非阻塞的.工作得很漂亮