Ham*_*fin 3 java reflection casting compiler-errors object
给出以下代码:
import java.lang.reflect.Array;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
public class Test {
public static void test_function(int[] values) {
System.out.println("Class of values : " + values.getClass());
System.out.println(values[0]);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Object a = Array.newInstance(int.class, 3);
Array.set(a, 0, 5);
Class a_class = a.getClass();
Class int_array_class = int[].class;
System.out.println("Class of int[] : " + int[].class);
System.out.println("Class of a : " + a.getClass());
System.out.println("int_array_class : " + int_array_class);
System.out.println("a_class : " + a_class);
// These instructions will provoke a compile-time error
// test_function(a);
// test_function(a_class.cast(a));
// test_function(int_array_class.cast(a));
// The following call won't cause any problem
test_function((int[]) a);
Method testf = null;
try {
testf = Test.class.getMethod("test_function", int[].class);
testf.invoke(null, a); // Does not provoke exception at run-time either
testf.invoke(null, a_class.cast(a));
testf.invoke(null, int_array_class.cast(a));
}
catch(Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我注意到显式地将Object传递给方法不起作用.如果取消注释,三条注释说明将引发以下错误:
Test.java:25: error: method test_function in class Test cannot be applied to given types;
test_function(a);
^
required: int[]
found: Object
reason: actual argument Object cannot be converted to int[] by method invocation conversion
Test.java:26: error: method test_function in class Test cannot be applied to given types;
test_function(a_class.cast(a));
^
required: int[]
found: Object
reason: actual argument Object cannot be converted to int[] by method invocation conversion
Test.java:27: error: method test_function in class Test cannot be applied to given types;
test_function(int_array_class.cast(a));
^
required: int[]
found: Object
reason: actual argument Object cannot be converted to int[] by method invocation conversion
3 errors
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但是,通过反射传递对象可以正常工作并产生预期的结果.
Class of int[] : class [I
Class of a : class [I
int_array_class : class [I
a_class : class [I
Class of values : class [I
5
Class of values : class [I
5
Class of values : class [I
5
Class of values : class [I
5
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
所以问题是:为什么编译器拒绝编译在运行时工作正常的三个命令指令?
反射访问能够在运行时确定对象的实际类型.另一方面,编译器只知道声明的类型.它没有任何其他检查实际类型参数的可能性.
您的变量a声明为Object.因此
test_function(a);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
您尝试使用void test_function(Object)根本不存在的签名调用方法.一个简单的演员 - 就像你和程序员一样知道正确的类型 - 会在这里有所帮助:
test_function((int[]) a); // works fine (even at runtime)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
另外两个方法调用是相同的,但有点不同.你声明了a_class和int_array_class类型Class.这是一个原始类型,因此编译器不知道这些变量可以引用哪种类型.编译器必须推断类型Object.这导致了与以前相同的问题(和解决方案).
但是,它Class是一种通用类型,可以参数化.通过以下更改,最后一个方法调用无需显式转换:
Class<int[]> int_array_class = int[].class;
test_function(int_array_class.cast(a));
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
360 次 |
| 最近记录: |