我ReturnItem上课了.
眼镜:
require 'spec_helper'
describe ReturnItem do
#is this enough?
it { should respond_to :chosen }
it { should respond_to :chosen= }
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
类:
class ReturnItem
attr_accessor :chosen
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这似乎有点乏味,因为attr_accessor几乎每个班级都使用它.在rspec中是否有一个快捷方式来测试getter和setter的默认功能?或者我是否必须为每个属性单独和手动测试getter和setter的过程?
Ell*_*son 15
我为此创建了一个自定义的rspec匹配器:
spec/custom/matchers/should_have_attr_accessor.rb
RSpec::Matchers.define :have_attr_accessor do |field|
match do |object_instance|
object_instance.respond_to?(field) &&
object_instance.respond_to?("#{field}=")
end
failure_message_for_should do |object_instance|
"expected attr_accessor for #{field} on #{object_instance}"
end
failure_message_for_should_not do |object_instance|
"expected attr_accessor for #{field} not to be defined on #{object_instance}"
end
description do
"checks to see if there is an attr accessor on the supplied object"
end
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
然后在我的规范中,我这样使用它:
subject { described_class.new }
it { should have_attr_accessor(:foo) }
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Mar*_*her 12
这是使用RSpec的3以前的答案的更新版本,取代failure_message_for_should了failure_message和failure_message_for_should_not为failure_message_when_negated:
RSpec::Matchers.define :have_attr_accessor do |field|
match do |object_instance|
object_instance.respond_to?(field) &&
object_instance.respond_to?("#{field}=")
end
failure_message do |object_instance|
"expected attr_accessor for #{field} on #{object_instance}"
end
failure_message_when_negated do |object_instance|
"expected attr_accessor for #{field} not to be defined on #{object_instance}"
end
description do
"assert there is an attr_accessor of the given name on the supplied object"
end
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)