Rspec有(n).items未定义的方法

Question

我正在尝试遵循code.tuts的指南,我一直收到错误.

这是我的图书馆规范:

require 'spec_helper'

describe Library do
  before :all do
    lib_arr = [
      Book.new("JavaScript: The Good Parts", "Douglas Crockford", :development),
      Book.new("Dont Make me Think", "Steve Krug", :usability),
    ]

    File.open "books.yml", "w" do |f|
      f.write YAML::dump lib_arr
    end
  end

  before :each do
    @lib = Library.new "books.yml"
  end

  describe  "#new" do
    context "with no parameters" do
      it "has no book" do
        lib = Library.new
        expect(lib).to have(0).books
      end
    end

    context "with a yaml file name parameters" do
      it "has two books" do
        expect(@lib).to_have(0).books
      end
    end
  end

  it "returns all the books in a given category" do
    expect(@lib.get_books_in_category(:development).length).to eql 1
  end

  it "accepts new books" do
    @lib.add_book(Book.new("Designing for the Web", "Mark Boulton", :design))
    expect(@lib.get_book("Designing for the Web")).to be_an_instance_of Book
  end

  it "saves the library" do
    books = @lib.books.map { |book| book.title}
    @lib.save
    lib2 = Library.new 'books.yml'
    books2 = lib2.books.map { |book| book.title }
    expect(books).to eql books2
  end
end

我得到的have是未定义的.我发现这是我的台词

expect(@lib).to have(0).books
expect(lib).to have(0).books

我的语法过时了吗？我用谷歌搜索,我找不到它.

Answer 1

的have/ have_exactly,have_at_least并have_at_most匹配器从RSpec的3除去他们现在在单独的RSpec-collection_matchers宝石.

或者,如zishe说,而不是安装的宝石,你可以使用eq,而不是have/ have_exactly,和be >=代替have_at_least和be <=代替的have_at_most.

资料来源:http://myronmars.to/n/dev-blog/2014/05/notable-changes-in-rspec-3