Bil*_*ell 2 rhino-mocks arrange-act-assert
我花了很多时间试图弄清楚为什么简单的RhinoMocks测试不会返回我在返回时设置的值.我确信我只是错过了一些非常简单的东西,但我无法弄明白.这是我的测试:
[TestMethod]
public void CopyvRAFiles_ShouldCallCopyvRAFiles_ShouldReturnTrue2()
{
FileInfo fi = new FileInfo(@"c:\Myprogram.txt");
FileInfo[] myFileInfo = new FileInfo[2];
myFileInfo[0] = fi;
myFileInfo[1] = fi;
var mockSystemIO = MockRepository.GenerateMock<ISystemIO>();
mockSystemIO.Stub(x => x.GetFilesForCopy("c:")).Return(myFileInfo);
mockSystemIO.Expect(y => y.FileCopyDateCheck(@"c:\Myprogram.txt", @"c:\Myprogram.txt")).Return("Test");
CopyFiles copy = new CopyFiles(mockSystemIO);
List<string> retValue = copy.CopyvRAFiles("c:", "c:", new AdminWindowViewModel(vRASharedData));
mockSystemIO.VerifyAllExpectations();
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我有一个我的SystemIO类的接口我正在通过模拟传递给我的CopyFiles类.我在我的FileCopyDatCheck方法上设置了一个期望,并说它应该返回("测试").当我单步执行代码时,它返回一个null insteaed.我在这里缺少什么想法?
这是我的CopyFiles类方法:
public List<string> CopyvRAFiles(string currentDirectoryPath, string destPath, AdminWindowViewModel adminWindowViewModel)
{
string fileCopied;
List<string> filesCopied = new List<string>();
try
{
sysIO.CreateDirectoryIfNotExist(destPath);
FileInfo[] files = sysIO.GetFilesForCopy(currentDirectoryPath);
if (files != null)
{
foreach (FileInfo file in files)
{
fileCopied = sysIO.FileCopyDateCheck(file.FullName, destPath + file.Name);
filesCopied.Add(fileCopied);
}
}
//adminWindowViewModel.CheckFilesThatRequireSystemUpdate(filesCopied);
return filesCopied;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
ExceptionPolicy.HandleException(ex, "vRAClientPolicy");
Console.WriteLine("{0} Exception caught.", ex);
ShowErrorMessageDialog(ex);
return null;
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我认为"fileCopied"将具有Expect设置的Return值.GetFilesForCopy返回myFileInfo中的两个文件.请帮忙.:)
提前致谢!
有模拟不会开始返回记录答案,直到它被切换到回放模式下使用Replay()
.存根和模拟不会以同样的方式工作.我写了一篇关于差异的博客文章.
另请注意,您将旧的record-replay-verify语法与新的arrange-act-assert语法混合使用.使用AAA,你不应该使用模拟和Expect
.相反,使用存根,AssertWasCalled
像这样:
[TestMethod]
public void CopyvRAFiles_ShouldCallCopyvRAFiles_ShouldReturnTrue2()
{
// arrange
FileInfo fi = new FileInfo(@"c:\Myprogram.txt");
FileInfo[] myFileInfo = new FileInfo[2];
myFileInfo[0] = fi;
myFileInfo[1] = fi;
var stubSystemIO = MockRepository.GenerateStub<ISystemIO>();
stubSystemIO.Stub(
x => x.GetFilesForCopy(Arg<string>.Is.Anything)).Return(myFileInfo);
stubSystemIO.Stub(
y => y.FileCopyDateCheck(
Arg<string>.Is.Anything, Arg<string>.Is.Anything)).Return("Test");
CopyFiles copy = new CopyFiles(mockSystemIO);
// act
List<string> retValue = copy.CopyvRAFiles(
"c:", "c:", new AdminWindowViewModel(vRASharedData));
// make assertions here about return values, state of objects, stub usage
stubSystemIO.AssertWasCalled(
y => y.FileCopyDateCheck(@"c:\Myprogram.txt", @"c:\Myprogram.txt"));
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
请注意如何在开始时设置存根的行为与最后的断言分开.Stub
不设定任何期望.
分离行为和断言的优点是,您可以在每次测试中减少断言次数,从而更容易诊断测试失败的原因.