我查看了MonadState的源代码,我不明白为什么这3个函数不会进入死循环?这是如何评估的?
class Monad m => MonadState s m | m -> s where
-- | Return the state from the internals of the monad.
get :: m s
get = state (\s -> (s, s))
-- | Replace the state inside the monad.
put :: s -> m ()
put s = state (\_ -> ((), s))
-- | Embed a simple state action into the monad.
state :: (s -> (a, s)) -> m a
state f = do
s <- get
let ~(a, s') = f s
put s'
return a
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
的定义get,put,state
在类的声明是默认的实现,这意味着在类的实际情况来进行覆盖.这样一来,死循环被打破:如果一个实例仅定义state
,然后get
和put
在使用类的默认实现它的术语的定义.类似地,如果一个实例定义get
和put
,然后state
将默认.
例如,Eq
类型类可能已定义如下:
class Eq a where
(==) :: a -> a -> Bool
x == y = not (x /= y)
(/=) :: a -> a -> Bool
x /= y = not (x == y)
instance Eq Bool where
True == True = True
False == False = True
_ == _ = False
-- the (/=) operator is automatically derived
instance Eq () where
() /= () = False
-- the (==) operator is automatically derived
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
除非在实例中重新定义某些内容,否则默认的自引用实现确实很常见.