Guy*_*Guy 419 .net c# algorithm unicode performance
我只需要在C#2.0中编写一个字符串反向函数(即LINQ不可用)并想出了这个:
public string Reverse(string text)
{
char[] cArray = text.ToCharArray();
string reverse = String.Empty;
for (int i = cArray.Length - 1; i > -1; i--)
{
reverse += cArray[i];
}
return reverse;
}
就个人而言,我并不是对这个功能感到疯狂,并且我确信有更好的方法可以做到这一点.在那儿？
Pet*_*teT 559
public static string Reverse( string s )
{
char[] charArray = s.ToCharArray();
Array.Reverse( charArray );
return new string( charArray );
}
R. *_*des 171
在这里,妥善反转字符串的解决方案"Les Mise\u0301rables"的"selbare\u0301siM seL".这应该呈现selbarésiM seL,不是selbar?esiM seL(注意重音的位置),大多数实现的结果都是基于代码单元(Array.Reverse等)或甚至代码点(特别注意代理对的反转).
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Globalization;
using System.Linq;
public static class Test
{
private static IEnumerable<string> GraphemeClusters(this string s) {
var enumerator = StringInfo.GetTextElementEnumerator(s);
while(enumerator.MoveNext()) {
yield return (string)enumerator.Current;
}
}
private static string ReverseGraphemeClusters(this string s) {
return string.Join("", s.GraphemeClusters().Reverse().ToArray());
}
public static void Main()
{
var s = "Les Mise\u0301rables";
var r = s.ReverseGraphemeClusters();
Console.WriteLine(r);
}
}
(现场运行示例:https://ideone.com/DqAeMJ)
它只是使用.NET API进行字形集群迭代,它从那时起一直存在,但看起来有点"隐藏".
Sam*_*ron 125
这结果是一个令人惊讶的棘手问题.
我建议在大多数情况下使用Array.Reverse,因为它是本地编码的,维护和理解非常简单.
在我测试的所有情况下,它似乎都优于StringBuilder.
public string Reverse(string text)
{
if (text == null) return null;
// this was posted by petebob as well
char[] array = text.ToCharArray();
Array.Reverse(array);
return new String(array);
}
对于使用Xor的某些字符串长度,有第二种方法可以更快.
public static string ReverseXor(string s)
{
if (s == null) return null;
char[] charArray = s.ToCharArray();
int len = s.Length - 1;
for (int i = 0; i < len; i++, len--)
{
charArray[i] ^= charArray[len];
charArray[len] ^= charArray[i];
charArray[i] ^= charArray[len];
}
return new string(charArray);
}
注意如果要支持完整的Unicode UTF16字符集,请阅读此内容.而是使用那里的实现.它可以通过使用上述算法之一进行进一步优化,并在字符串反转后通过字符串进行清理.
这是StringBuilder,Array.Reverse和Xor方法之间的性能比较.
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Diagnostics;
namespace ConsoleApplication4
{
class Program
{
delegate string StringDelegate(string s);
static void Benchmark(string description, StringDelegate d, int times, string text)
{
Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
sw.Start();
for (int j = 0; j < times; j++)
{
d(text);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("{0} Ticks {1} : called {2} times.", sw.ElapsedTicks, description, times);
}
public static string ReverseXor(string s)
{
char[] charArray = s.ToCharArray();
int len = s.Length - 1;
for (int i = 0; i < len; i++, len--)
{
charArray[i] ^= charArray[len];
charArray[len] ^= charArray[i];
charArray[i] ^= charArray[len];
}
return new string(charArray);
}
public static string ReverseSB(string text)
{
StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder(text.Length);
for (int i = text.Length - 1; i >= 0; i--)
{
builder.Append(text[i]);
}
return builder.ToString();
}
public static string ReverseArray(string text)
{
char[] array = text.ToCharArray();
Array.Reverse(array);
return (new string(array));
}
public static string StringOfLength(int length)
{
Random random = new Random();
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < length; i++)
{
sb.Append(Convert.ToChar(Convert.ToInt32(Math.Floor(26 * random.NextDouble() + 65))));
}
return sb.ToString();
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
int[] lengths = new int[] {1,10,15,25,50,75,100,1000,100000};
foreach (int l in lengths)
{
int iterations = 10000;
string text = StringOfLength(l);
Benchmark(String.Format("String Builder (Length: {0})", l), ReverseSB, iterations, text);
Benchmark(String.Format("Array.Reverse (Length: {0})", l), ReverseArray, iterations, text);
Benchmark(String.Format("Xor (Length: {0})", l), ReverseXor, iterations, text);
Console.WriteLine();
}
Console.Read();
}
}
}
结果如下:
26251 Ticks String Builder (Length: 1) : called 10000 times.
33373 Ticks Array.Reverse (Length: 1) : called 10000 times.
20162 Ticks Xor (Length: 1) : called 10000 times.
51321 Ticks String Builder (Length: 10) : called 10000 times.
37105 Ticks Array.Reverse (Length: 10) : called 10000 times.
23974 Ticks Xor (Length: 10) : called 10000 times.
66570 Ticks String Builder (Length: 15) : called 10000 times.
26027 Ticks Array.Reverse (Length: 15) : called 10000 times.
24017 Ticks Xor (Length: 15) : called 10000 times.
101609 Ticks String Builder (Length: 25) : called 10000 times.
28472 Ticks Array.Reverse (Length: 25) : called 10000 times.
35355 Ticks Xor (Length: 25) : called 10000 times.
161601 Ticks String Builder (Length: 50) : called 10000 times.
35839 Ticks Array.Reverse (Length: 50) : called 10000 times.
51185 Ticks Xor (Length: 50) : called 10000 times.
230898 Ticks String Builder (Length: 75) : called 10000 times.
40628 Ticks Array.Reverse (Length: 75) : called 10000 times.
78906 Ticks Xor (Length: 75) : called 10000 times.
312017 Ticks String Builder (Length: 100) : called 10000 times.
52225 Ticks Array.Reverse (Length: 100) : called 10000 times.
110195 Ticks Xor (Length: 100) : called 10000 times.
2970691 Ticks String Builder (Length: 1000) : called 10000 times.
292094 Ticks Array.Reverse (Length: 1000) : called 10000 times.
846585 Ticks Xor (Length: 1000) : called 10000 times.
305564115 Ticks String Builder (Length: 100000) : called 10000 times.
74884495 Ticks Array.Reverse (Length: 100000) : called 10000 times.
125409674 Ticks Xor (Length: 100000) : called 10000 times.
对于短字符串来说,Xor似乎更快.
Bra*_*ger 49
如果字符串包含Unicode数据(严格来说,非BMP字符),则已发布的其他方法将损坏它,因为在反转字符串时无法交换高和低代理代码单元的顺序.(有关此内容的更多信息,请访问我的博客.)
以下代码示例将正确反转包含非BMP字符的字符串,例如"\ U00010380\U00010381"(Ugaritic Letter Alpa,Ugaritic Letter Beta).
public static string Reverse(this string input)
{
if (input == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("input");
// allocate a buffer to hold the output
char[] output = new char[input.Length];
for (int outputIndex = 0, inputIndex = input.Length - 1; outputIndex < input.Length; outputIndex++, inputIndex--)
{
// check for surrogate pair
if (input[inputIndex] >= 0xDC00 && input[inputIndex] <= 0xDFFF &&
inputIndex > 0 && input[inputIndex - 1] >= 0xD800 && input[inputIndex - 1] <= 0xDBFF)
{
// preserve the order of the surrogate pair code units
output[outputIndex + 1] = input[inputIndex];
output[outputIndex] = input[inputIndex - 1];
outputIndex++;
inputIndex--;
}
else
{
output[outputIndex] = input[inputIndex];
}
}
return new string(output);
}
SGR*_*Rao 48
来自3.5框架
public string ReverseString(string srtVarable)
{
return new string(srtVarable.Reverse().ToArray());
}
ric*_*ent 25
好的,为了"不要重复自己",我提供了以下解决方案:
public string Reverse(string text)
{
return Microsoft.VisualBasic.Strings.StrReverse(text);
}
我的理解是这个实现,默认情况下在VB.NET中可用,正确处理Unicode字符.
Dan*_*Tao 17
Greg Beech发布的unsafe选项确实和它一样快(它是一个就地反转); 但是,正如他在回答中指出的那样,这是一个完全灾难性的想法.
也就是说,我很惊讶有很多共识Array.Reverse是最快的方法.还有一种unsafe方法可以返回字符串的反向副本(没有就地反转恶作剧),比Array.Reverse小字符串的方法要快得多:
public static unsafe string Reverse(string text)
{
int len = text.Length;
// Why allocate a char[] array on the heap when you won't use it
// outside of this method? Use the stack.
char* reversed = stackalloc char[len];
// Avoid bounds-checking performance penalties.
fixed (char* str = text)
{
int i = 0;
int j = i + len - 1;
while (i < len)
{
reversed[i++] = str[j--];
}
}
// Need to use this overload for the System.String constructor
// as providing just the char* pointer could result in garbage
// at the end of the string (no guarantee of null terminator).
return new string(reversed, 0, len);
}
Array.Reverse随着字符串变大,您可以看到性能增益收缩然后消失.但是对于中小型琴弦来说,很难击败这种方法.
Meh*_*loo 14
简单而好的答案是使用扩展方法:
static class ExtentionMethodCollection
{
public static string Inverse(this string @base)
{
return new string(@base.Reverse().ToArray());
}
}
这是输出:
string Answer = "12345".Inverse(); // = "54321"
Gre*_*ech 13
如果你想玩一个非常危险的游戏,那么这是迄今为止最快的方式(比Array.Reverse方法快四倍).这是使用指针的就地反向.
请注意,我真的不推荐这个用于任何用途(看看这里有一些原因,你不应该使用这个方法),但是看到它可以完成,并且字符串不是真正不可变的,这很有趣一旦你打开不安全的代码.
public static unsafe string Reverse(string text)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(text))
{
return text;
}
fixed (char* pText = text)
{
char* pStart = pText;
char* pEnd = pText + text.Length - 1;
for (int i = text.Length / 2; i >= 0; i--)
{
char temp = *pStart;
*pStart++ = *pEnd;
*pEnd-- = temp;
}
return text;
}
}
Mik*_*son 11
在这里查看维基百科条目.它们实现String.Reverse扩展方法.这允许您编写如下代码:
string s = "olleh";
s.Reverse();
他们还使用ToCharArray/Reverse组合,这个问题的其他答案表明.源代码如下所示:
public static string Reverse(this string input)
{
char[] chars = input.ToCharArray();
Array.Reverse(chars);
return new String(chars);
}
Gre*_*ech 11
首先,您不需要调用ToCharArray字符串已经可以索引为char数组,因此这将为您节省分配.
下一个优化是使用a StringBuilder来防止不必要的分配(因为字符串是不可变的,连接它们每次都会生成字符串的副本).为了进一步优化这个,我们预先设置了StringBuilder它的长度,因此不需要扩展它的缓冲区.
public string Reverse(string text)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(text))
{
return text;
}
StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder(text.Length);
for (int i = text.Length - 1; i >= 0; i--)
{
builder.Append(text[i]);
}
return builder.ToString();
}
编辑:效果数据
我使用Array.Reverse以下简单程序测试了这个函数和函数,其中Reverse1一个是函数,另一个函数Reverse2是:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var text = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";
// pre-jit
text = Reverse1(text);
text = Reverse2(text);
// test
var timer1 = Stopwatch.StartNew();
for (var i = 0; i < 10000000; i++)
{
text = Reverse1(text);
}
timer1.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("First: {0}", timer1.ElapsedMilliseconds);
var timer2 = Stopwatch.StartNew();
for (var i = 0; i < 10000000; i++)
{
text = Reverse2(text);
}
timer2.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("Second: {0}", timer2.ElapsedMilliseconds);
Console.ReadLine();
}
事实证明,对于短弦乐队来说,这种Array.Reverse方法的速度大约是上面的两倍,而对于较长的琴弦,差异甚至更明显.因此,鉴于该Array.Reverse方法既简单又快捷,我建议您使用它而不是这个.我把这个留在这里只是为了表明这不是你应该这样做的方式(令我惊讶的是!)
Mik*_*Two 10
尝试使用Array.Reverse
public string Reverse(string str)
{
char[] array = str.ToCharArray();
Array.Reverse(array);
return new string(array);
}
Vla*_*den 10
public static string Reverse(string input)
{
return string.Concat(Enumerable.Reverse(input));
}
当然,您可以使用Reverse方法扩展字符串类
public static class StringExtensions
{
public static string Reverse(this string input)
{
return string.Concat(Enumerable.Reverse(input));
}
}
Flo*_*gex 10
从 .NET Core 2.1 开始，有一种使用string.Create方法反转字符串的新方法。
请注意，此解决方案无法正确处理 Unicode 组合字符等，因为“Les Mise\u0301rables”将转换为“selbarésiM seL”。在其他的答案一个更好的解决方案。
public static string Reverse(string input)
{
return string.Create<string>(input.Length, input, (chars, state) =>
{
state.AsSpan().CopyTo(chars);
chars.Reverse();
});
}
这实质上是将 的字符复制input到一个新字符串并就地反转新字符串。
string.Create有用？当我们从现有数组创建字符串时，会分配一个新的内部数组并复制值。否则，有可能在字符串创建后对其进行变异（在安全环境中）。也就是说，在下面的代码片段中，我们必须两次分配长度为 10 的数组，一次作为缓冲区，另一次作为字符串的内部数组。
var chars = new char[10];
// set array values
var str = new string(chars);
string.Create本质上允许我们在字符串的创建期间操作内部数组。也就是说，我们不再需要缓冲区，因此可以避免分配那个字符数组。
Steve Gordon 在此处更详细地介绍了它。MSDN上也有一篇文章。
string.Create？public static string Create<TState>(int length, TState state, SpanAction<char, TState> action);
该方法接受三个参数：
char新字符串的内部数组，第二个参数是您传递给的数据（状态）string.Create。在委托中，我们可以指定如何从数据创建新字符串。在我们的例子中，我们只是将输入字符串的字符复制到Span新字符串使用的字符中。然后我们反转Span，因此整个字符串被反转。
为了将我提出的反转字符串的方法与接受的答案进行比较，我使用 BenchmarkDotNet 编写了两个基准测试。
public class StringExtensions
{
public static string ReverseWithArray(string input)
{
var charArray = input.ToCharArray();
Array.Reverse(charArray);
return new string(charArray);
}
public static string ReverseWithStringCreate(string input)
{
return string.Create(input.Length, input, (chars, state) =>
{
state.AsSpan().CopyTo(chars);
chars.Reverse();
});
}
}
[MemoryDiagnoser]
public class StringReverseBenchmarks
{
private string input;
[Params(10, 100, 1000)]
public int InputLength { get; set; }
[GlobalSetup]
public void SetInput()
{
// Creates a random string of the given length
this.input = RandomStringGenerator.GetString(InputLength);
}
[Benchmark(Baseline = true)]
public string WithReverseArray() => StringExtensions.ReverseWithArray(input);
[Benchmark]
public string WithStringCreate() => StringExtensions.ReverseWithStringCreate(input);
}
这是我机器上的结果：
| Method | InputLength | Mean | Error | StdDev | Gen 0 | Allocated |
| ---------------- | ----------- | -----------: | ---------: | --------: | -----: | --------: |
| WithReverseArray | 10 | 45.464 ns | 0.4836 ns | 0.4524 ns | 0.0610 | 96 B |
| WithStringCreate | 10 | 39.749 ns | 0.3206 ns | 0.2842 ns | 0.0305 | 48 B |
| | | | | | | |
| WithReverseArray | 100 | 175.162 ns | 2.8766 ns | 2.2458 ns | 0.2897 | 456 B |
| WithStringCreate | 100 | 125.284 ns | 2.4657 ns | 2.0590 ns | 0.1473 | 232 B |
| | | | | | | |
| WithReverseArray | 1000 | 1,523.544 ns | 9.8808 ns | 8.7591 ns | 2.5768 | 4056 B |
| WithStringCreate | 1000 | 1,078.957 ns | 10.2948 ns | 9.6298 ns | 1.2894 | 2032 B |
如您所见，ReverseWithStringCreate我们只分配了该ReverseWithArray方法使用的内存的一半。
不要打扰功能,只需这样做.注意:第二行将在某些VS版本的立即窗口中引发参数异常.
string s = "Blah";
s = new string(s.ToCharArray().Reverse().ToArray());
"最好的"可以取决于许多事情,但这里有一些从快到慢排序的简短替代品:
string s = "z?a?l?g?o?", pattern = @"(?s).(?<=(?:.(?=.*$(?<=((\P{M}\p{C}?\p{M}*)\1?))))*)";
string s1 = string.Concat(s.Reverse()); // "???o?g?l?a?z"
string s2 = Microsoft.VisualBasic.Strings.StrReverse(s); // "o?g?l?a??z"
string s3 = string.Concat(StringInfo.ParseCombiningCharacters(s).Reverse()
.Select(i => StringInfo.GetNextTextElement(s, i))); // "o?g?l?a?z?"
string s4 = Regex.Replace(s, pattern, "$2").Remove(s.Length); // "o?g?l?a?z?"
抱歉，很长的帖子，但这可能很有趣
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Text;
namespace ConsoleApplication1
{
class Program
{
public static string ReverseUsingArrayClass(string text)
{
char[] chars = text.ToCharArray();
Array.Reverse(chars);
return new string(chars);
}
public static string ReverseUsingCharacterBuffer(string text)
{
char[] charArray = new char[text.Length];
int inputStrLength = text.Length - 1;
for (int idx = 0; idx <= inputStrLength; idx++)
{
charArray[idx] = text[inputStrLength - idx];
}
return new string(charArray);
}
public static string ReverseUsingStringBuilder(string text)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(text))
{
return text;
}
StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder(text.Length);
for (int i = text.Length - 1; i >= 0; i--)
{
builder.Append(text[i]);
}
return builder.ToString();
}
private static string ReverseUsingStack(string input)
{
Stack<char> resultStack = new Stack<char>();
foreach (char c in input)
{
resultStack.Push(c);
}
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
while (resultStack.Count > 0)
{
sb.Append(resultStack.Pop());
}
return sb.ToString();
}
public static string ReverseUsingXOR(string text)
{
char[] charArray = text.ToCharArray();
int length = text.Length - 1;
for (int i = 0; i < length; i++, length--)
{
charArray[i] ^= charArray[length];
charArray[length] ^= charArray[i];
charArray[i] ^= charArray[length];
}
return new string(charArray);
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
string testString = string.Join(";", new string[] {
new string('a', 100),
new string('b', 101),
new string('c', 102),
new string('d', 103),
});
int cycleCount = 100000;
Stopwatch stopwatch = new Stopwatch();
stopwatch.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < cycleCount; i++)
{
ReverseUsingCharacterBuffer(testString);
}
stopwatch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("ReverseUsingCharacterBuffer: " + stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds + "ms");
stopwatch.Reset();
stopwatch.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < cycleCount; i++)
{
ReverseUsingArrayClass(testString);
}
stopwatch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("ReverseUsingArrayClass: " + stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds + "ms");
stopwatch.Reset();
stopwatch.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < cycleCount; i++)
{
ReverseUsingStringBuilder(testString);
}
stopwatch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("ReverseUsingStringBuilder: " + stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds + "ms");
stopwatch.Reset();
stopwatch.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < cycleCount; i++)
{
ReverseUsingStack(testString);
}
stopwatch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("ReverseUsingStack: " + stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds + "ms");
stopwatch.Reset();
stopwatch.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < cycleCount; i++)
{
ReverseUsingXOR(testString);
}
stopwatch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("ReverseUsingXOR: " + stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds + "ms");
}
}
}
结果：
public string Reverse(string input)
{
char[] output = new char[input.Length];
int forwards = 0;
int backwards = input.Length - 1;
do
{
output[forwards] = input[backwards];
output[backwards] = input[forwards];
}while(++forwards <= --backwards);
return new String(output);
}
public string DotNetReverse(string input)
{
char[] toReverse = input.ToCharArray();
Array.Reverse(toReverse);
return new String(toReverse);
}
public string NaiveReverse(string input)
{
char[] outputArray = new char[input.Length];
for (int i = 0; i < input.Length; i++)
{
outputArray[i] = input[input.Length - 1 - i];
}
return new String(outputArray);
}
public string RecursiveReverse(string input)
{
return RecursiveReverseHelper(input, 0, input.Length - 1);
}
public string RecursiveReverseHelper(string input, int startIndex , int endIndex)
{
if (startIndex == endIndex)
{
return "" + input[startIndex];
}
if (endIndex - startIndex == 1)
{
return "" + input[endIndex] + input[startIndex];
}
return input[endIndex] + RecursiveReverseHelper(input, startIndex + 1, endIndex - 1) + input[startIndex];
}
void Main()
{
int[] sizes = new int[] { 10, 100, 1000, 10000 };
for(int sizeIndex = 0; sizeIndex < sizes.Length; sizeIndex++)
{
string holaMundo = "";
for(int i = 0; i < sizes[sizeIndex]; i+= 5)
{
holaMundo += "ABCDE";
}
string.Format("\n**** For size: {0} ****\n", sizes[sizeIndex]).Dump();
string odnuMaloh = DotNetReverse(holaMundo);
var stopWatch = Stopwatch.StartNew();
string result = NaiveReverse(holaMundo);
("Naive Ticks: " + stopWatch.ElapsedTicks).Dump();
stopWatch.Restart();
result = Reverse(holaMundo);
("Efficient linear Ticks: " + stopWatch.ElapsedTicks).Dump();
stopWatch.Restart();
result = RecursiveReverse(holaMundo);
("Recursive Ticks: " + stopWatch.ElapsedTicks).Dump();
stopWatch.Restart();
result = DotNetReverse(holaMundo);
("DotNet Reverse Ticks: " + stopWatch.ElapsedTicks).Dump();
}
}
输出
尺寸：10
Naive Ticks: 1
Efficient linear Ticks: 0
Recursive Ticks: 2
DotNet Reverse Ticks: 1
尺寸：100
Naive Ticks: 2
Efficient linear Ticks: 1
Recursive Ticks: 12
DotNet Reverse Ticks: 1
尺寸：1000
Naive Ticks: 5
Efficient linear Ticks: 2
Recursive Ticks: 358
DotNet Reverse Ticks: 9
尺寸：10000
Naive Ticks: 32
Efficient linear Ticks: 28
Recursive Ticks: 84808
DotNet Reverse Ticks: 33
我已经从Microsoft.VisualBasic.Strings制作了一个 C# 端口。我不知道为什么他们将这些有用的函数（来自 VB）保留在 Framework 中的 System.String 之外，但仍在 Microsoft.VisualBasic 下。财务职能的情况相同（例如Microsoft.VisualBasic.Financial.Pmt()）。
public static string StrReverse(this string expression)
{
if ((expression == null))
return "";
int srcIndex;
var length = expression.Length;
if (length == 0)
return "";
//CONSIDER: Get System.String to add a surrogate aware Reverse method
//Detect if there are any graphemes that need special handling
for (srcIndex = 0; srcIndex <= length - 1; srcIndex++)
{
var ch = expression[srcIndex];
var uc = char.GetUnicodeCategory(ch);
if (uc == UnicodeCategory.Surrogate || uc == UnicodeCategory.NonSpacingMark || uc == UnicodeCategory.SpacingCombiningMark || uc == UnicodeCategory.EnclosingMark)
{
//Need to use special handling
return InternalStrReverse(expression, srcIndex, length);
}
}
var chars = expression.ToCharArray();
Array.Reverse(chars);
return new string(chars);
}
///<remarks>This routine handles reversing Strings containing graphemes
/// GRAPHEME: a text element that is displayed as a single character</remarks>
private static string InternalStrReverse(string expression, int srcIndex, int length)
{
//This code can only be hit one time
var sb = new StringBuilder(length) { Length = length };
var textEnum = StringInfo.GetTextElementEnumerator(expression, srcIndex);
//Init enumerator position
if (!textEnum.MoveNext())
{
return "";
}
var lastSrcIndex = 0;
var destIndex = length - 1;
//Copy up the first surrogate found
while (lastSrcIndex < srcIndex)
{
sb[destIndex] = expression[lastSrcIndex];
destIndex -= 1;
lastSrcIndex += 1;
}
//Now iterate through the text elements and copy them to the reversed string
var nextSrcIndex = textEnum.ElementIndex;
while (destIndex >= 0)
{
srcIndex = nextSrcIndex;
//Move to next element
nextSrcIndex = (textEnum.MoveNext()) ? textEnum.ElementIndex : length;
lastSrcIndex = nextSrcIndex - 1;
while (lastSrcIndex >= srcIndex)
{
sb[destIndex] = expression[lastSrcIndex];
destIndex -= 1;
lastSrcIndex -= 1;
}
}
return sb.ToString();
}
最简单的方法：
string reversed = new string(text.Reverse().ToArray());