sri*_*sri 3 python linked-list list sorted
这是我的代码:
def merge_lists(head1, head2):
if head1 is None and head2 is None:
return None
if head1 is None:
return head2
if head2 is None:
return head1
if head1.value < head2.value:
temp = head1
else:
temp = head2
while head1 != None and head2 != None:
if head1.value < head2.value:
temp.next = head1
head1 = head1.next
else:
temp.next = head2
head2 = head2.next
if head1 is None:
temp.next = head2
else:
temp.next = head1
return temp
pass
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这里的问题被困在无限循环中.任何人都告诉我问题是什么
例子是:
assert [] == merge_lists([],[])
assert [1,2,3] == merge_lists([1,2,3], [])
assert [1,2,3] == merge_lists([], [1,2,3])
assert [1,1,2,2,3,3,4,5] == merge_lists([1,2,3], [1,2,3,4,5])
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
use*_*740 10
当前代码的问题在于,在导航到当前节点的下一个节点之前,它会导致临时节点的副作用.当前临时节点是当前节点时,这是有问题的.
也就是说,想象一下这种情况:
temp = N
temp.next = N # which means N.next = N
N = N.next # but from above N = (N.next = N) -> N = N
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
有一个更正版本,还有一些其他更新:
def merge_lists(head1, head2):
if head1 is None:
return head2
if head2 is None:
return head1
# create dummy node to avoid additional checks in loop
s = t = node()
while not (head1 is None or head2 is None):
if head1.value < head2.value:
# remember current low-node
c = head1
# follow ->next
head1 = head1.next
else:
# remember current low-node
c = head2
# follow ->next
head2 = head2.next
# only mutate the node AFTER we have followed ->next
t.next = c
# and make sure we also advance the temp
t = t.next
t.next = head1 or head2
# return tail of dummy node
return s.next
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
合并两个排序链表的递归算法
def merge_lists(h1, h2):
if h1 is None:
return h2
if h2 is None:
return h1
if (h1.value < h2.value):
h1.next = merge_lists(h1.next, h2)
return h1
else:
h2.next = merge_lists(h2.next, h1)
return h2
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)