是否可以拦截(或意识到)COM引用计数暴露给COM的CLR对象

Bin*_*ier 17 .net c# reference-counting com-interop

我已经改写了这个问题.

当.net对象通过COM iterop公开给COM客户端时,会创建一个CCW(COM Callable Wrapper),它位于COM客户端和Managed .net对象之间.

在COM世界中,对象保留其他对象对其的引用数量的计数.当引用计数变为零时,将删除/释放/收集对象.这意味着COM对象终止是确定性的(我们在.net中使用Using/IDispose用于确定性终止,对象终结器是非确定性的).

每个CCW都是一个COM对象,它的引用计数与任何其他COM对象一样.当CCW死亡(引用计数变为零)时,GC将无法找到CCW包装的CLR对象,并且CLR对象有资格进行收集.快乐的日子,一切都与世隔绝.

我想要做的是在CCW死时(即当它的引用计数变为零时)捕获,并以某种方式将此信号通知给CLR对象(例如,通过在被管理对象上调用Dispose方法).

那么,是否可以知道CLR类的COM可调用包装器的引用计数何时变为零?
和/或
是否可以在.net中为CCW提供AddRef和ReleaseRef的实现?

如果不是替代方法是在ATL中实现这些DLL(我不需要任何ATL帮助,谢谢).它不是火箭科学,但我不愿意这样做,因为我是内部唯一的开发人员,任何现实世界的C++或任何ATL.

背景
我在.net中重写了一些旧的VB6 ActiveX DLL(确切地说是C#,但这更像是.net/COM互操作问题,而不是C#问题).一些旧的VB6对象依赖于引用计数来在对象终止时执行操作(参见上面引用计数的解释).这些DLL不包含重要的业务逻辑,它们是我们为使用VBScript与我们集成的客户提供的实用程序和帮助程序函数.

我不想做什么

  • 引用计数.net对象而不是使用垃圾收集器.我对GC很满意,我的问题不在于GC.
  • 使用对象终结器.终结器是非确定性的,在这种情况下我需要确定性终止(如.net中的Using/IDispose惯用法)
  • 在非托管C++中实现IUnknown
    如果我要使用C++路由,我将使用ATL,谢谢.
  • 使用Vb6解决此问题,或重新使用VB6对象.本练习的重点是消除我们对Vb6的构建依赖.

谢谢
BW

接受的答案
分毫不差一千感谢史蒂夫·施泰纳,谁,唯一的(可能是可行的)想出了基于.NET的答案,埃里克,谁用一个非常简单的解决方案ATL上来.

然而,接受的答案是Bigtoe,他建议将.net对象包装在VbScript对象中(我认为不诚实),有效地为VbScript问题提供了一个简单的VbScript解决方案.

谢谢大家.

Big*_*toe 5

OK伙计们,这是另一次尝试.实际上,您可以使用"Windows脚本组件"来包装.NET COM对象并以此方式完成最终化.这是一个使用简单的.NET计算器的完整示例,它可以添加值.我相信你会从那里得到这个概念,这完全避免了VB-Runtime,ATL问题,并使用了每个主要WIN32/WIN64平台上都可用的Windows Scripting Host.

我在名为DemoLib的名称空间中创建了一个名为Calculator的简单COM .NET类.注意这实现了IDisposable,为了演示的目的,我在屏幕上放了一些东西以显示它已经终止.我在.NET和脚本中完全坚持vb以保持简单,但.NET部分可以在C#等.当你保存这个文件时你需要用regsvr32注册它,它需要保存就像CalculatorLib.wsc一样.

<ComClass(Calculator.ClassId, Calculator.InterfaceId, Calculator.EventsId)> _
Public Class Calculator
    Implements IDisposable
#Region "COM GUIDs"
    ' These  GUIDs provide the COM identity for this class 
    ' and its COM interfaces. If you change them, existing 
    ' clients will no longer be able to access the class.
    Public Const ClassId As String = "68b420b3-3aa2-404a-a2d5-fa7497ad0ebc"
    Public Const InterfaceId As String = "0da9ab1a-176f-49c4-9334-286a3ad54353"
    Public Const EventsId As String = "ce93112f-d45e-41ba-86a0-c7d5a915a2c9"
#End Region
    ' A creatable COM class must have a Public Sub New() 
    ' with no parameters, otherwise, the class will not be 
    ' registered in the COM registry and cannot be created 
    ' via CreateObject.
    Public Sub New()
        MyBase.New()
    End Sub
    Public Function Add(ByVal x As Double, ByVal y As Double) As Double
        Return x + y
    End Function
    Private disposedValue As Boolean = False        ' To detect redundant calls
    ' IDisposable
    Protected Overridable Sub Dispose(ByVal disposing As Boolean)
        If Not Me.disposedValue Then
            If disposing Then
                MsgBox("Disposed called on .NET COM Calculator.")
            End If
        End If
        Me.disposedValue = True
    End Sub
#Region " IDisposable Support "
    ' This code added by Visual Basic to correctly implement the disposable pattern.
    Public Sub Dispose() Implements IDisposable.Dispose
        ' Do not change this code.  Put cleanup code in Dispose(ByVal disposing As Boolean) above.
        Dispose(True)
        GC.SuppressFinalize(Me)
    End Sub
#End Region
End Class
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

接下来,我创建一个名为Calculator.Lib的Windows脚本组件,它有一个返回VB脚本COM类的方法,该类公开.NET数学库.在构建和销毁期间,我在屏幕上弹出一些内容,请注意在Destruction中我们在.NET库中调用Dispose方法来释放资源.请注意使用Lib()函数将.NET Com Calculator返回给调用者.

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<component>
<?component error="true" debug="true"?>
<registration
    description="Demo Math Library Script"
    progid="Calculator.Lib"
    version="1.00"
    classid="{0df54960-4639-496a-a5dd-a9abf1154772}"
>
</registration>
<public>
  <method name="GetMathLibrary">
  </method>
</public>
<script language="VBScript">
<![CDATA[
Option Explicit
'-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
' public Function to return back a logger.
'-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
function GetMathLibrary()
    Set GetMathLibrary = New MathLibrary
end function
Class MathLibrary
    private dotNetMatFunctionLib
  private sub class_initialize()
    MsgBox "Created."
    Set dotNetMatFunctionLib = CreateObject("DemoLib.Calculator")
  end sub
  private sub class_terminate()
        dotNetMatFunctionLib.Dispose()
        Set dotNetMatFunctionLib = nothing
    MsgBox "Terminated."
  end sub
  public function Lib()
    Set Lib = dotNetMatFunctionLib
  End function
end class
]]>
</script>
</component>
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

最后,将所有这些组合在一起的示例VB脚本中,您将获得对话框,显示创建,计算,在.NET库中调用dispose,最后在COM组件中终止公开.NET组件.

dim comWrapper
dim vbsCalculator
set comWrapper = CreateObject("Calculator.Lib")
set vbsCalculator = comWrapper.GetMathLibrary()
msgbox "10 + 10 = " & vbsCalculator.lib.Add(10, 10)
msgbox "20 + 20 = " & vbsCalculator.lib.Add(20, 20)
set vbsCalculator = nothing
MsgBox("Dispose & Terminate should have been called before here.")
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)


Dar*_*ark 5

我意识到这是一个有点老问题,但我确实得到了一些时间回来的实际请求.

它的作用是使用自定义实现替换创建对象的VTBL中的Release,该实现在释放所有引用时调用Dispose.请注意,无法保证始终有效.主要假设是标准CCW的所有接口上的所有Release方法都是相同的方法.

使用风险由您自己承担.:)

/// <summary>
/// I base class to provide a mechanism where <see cref="IDisposable.Dispose"/>
/// will be called when the last reference count is released.
/// 
/// </summary>
public abstract class DisposableComObject: IDisposable
{
    #region Release Handler, ugly, do not look

    //You were warned.


    //This code is to enable us to call IDisposable.Dispose when the last ref count is released.
    //It relies on one things being true:
    // 1. That all COM Callable Wrappers use the same implementation of IUnknown.


    //What Release() looks like with an explit "this".
    private delegate int ReleaseDelegate(IntPtr unk);

    //GetFunctionPointerForDelegate does NOT prevent GC ofthe Delegate object, so we'll keep a reference to it so it's not GC'd.
    //That would be "bad".
    private static ReleaseDelegate myRelease = new ReleaseDelegate(Release);
    //This is the actual address of the Release function, so it can be called by unmanaged code.
    private static IntPtr myReleaseAddress = Marshal.GetFunctionPointerForDelegate(myRelease);


    //Get a Delegate that references IUnknown.Release in the CCW.
    //This is where we assume that all CCWs use the same IUnknown (or at least the same Release), since
    //we're getting the address of the Release method for a basic object.
    private static ReleaseDelegate unkRelease = GetUnkRelease();
    private static ReleaseDelegate GetUnkRelease()
    {
        object test = new object();
        IntPtr unk = Marshal.GetIUnknownForObject(test);
        try
        {
            IntPtr vtbl = Marshal.ReadIntPtr(unk);
            IntPtr releaseAddress = Marshal.ReadIntPtr(vtbl, 2 * IntPtr.Size);
            return (ReleaseDelegate)Marshal.GetDelegateForFunctionPointer(releaseAddress, typeof(ReleaseDelegate));
        }
        finally
        {
            Marshal.Release(unk);
        }
    }

    //Given an interface pointer, this will replace the address of Release in the vtable
    //with our own. Yes, I know.
    private static void HookReleaseForPtr(IntPtr ptr)
    {
        IntPtr vtbl = Marshal.ReadIntPtr(ptr);
        IntPtr releaseAddress = Marshal.ReadIntPtr(vtbl, 2 * IntPtr.Size);
        Marshal.WriteIntPtr(vtbl, 2 * IntPtr.Size, myReleaseAddress);
    }

    //Go and replace the address of CCW Release with the address of our Release
    //in all the COM visible vtables.
    private static void AddDisposeHandler(object o)
    {
        //Only bother if it is actually useful to hook Release to call Dispose
        if (Marshal.IsTypeVisibleFromCom(o.GetType()) && o is IDisposable)
        {
            //IUnknown has its very own vtable.
            IntPtr comInterface = Marshal.GetIUnknownForObject(o);
            try
            {
                HookReleaseForPtr(comInterface);
            }
            finally
            {
                Marshal.Release(comInterface);
            }
            //Walk the COM-Visible interfaces implemented
            //Note that while these have their own vtables, the function address of Release
            //is the same. At least in all observed cases it's the same, a check could be added here to
            //make sure the function pointer we're replacing is the one we read from GetIUnknownForObject(object)
            //during initialization
            foreach (Type intf in o.GetType().GetInterfaces())
            {
                if (Marshal.IsTypeVisibleFromCom(intf))
                {
                    comInterface = Marshal.GetComInterfaceForObject(o, intf);
                    try
                    {
                        HookReleaseForPtr(comInterface);
                    }
                    finally
                    {
                        Marshal.Release(comInterface);
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    }

    //Our own release. We will call the CCW Release, and then if our refCount hits 0 we will call Dispose.
    //Note that is really a method int IUnknown.Release. Our first parameter is our this pointer.
    private static int Release(IntPtr unk)
    {
        int refCount = unkRelease(unk);
        if (refCount == 0)
        {
            //This is us, so we know the interface is implemented
            ((IDisposable)Marshal.GetObjectForIUnknown(unk)).Dispose();
        }
        return refCount;
    }
    #endregion

    /// <summary>
    /// Creates a new <see cref="DisposableComObject"/>
    /// </summary>
    protected DisposableComObject()
    {
        AddDisposeHandler(this);
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Calls <see cref="Dispose"/> with false.
    /// </summary>
    ~DisposableComObject()
    {
        Dispose(false);
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Override to dispose the object, called when ref count hits or during GC.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="disposing"><b>true</b> if called because of a 0 refcount</param>
    protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
    {

    }

    void IDisposable.Dispose()
    {
        Dispose(true);
        GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
    }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

  • 我很惊讶这没有得到更多选票,因为这是唯一真正回答问题的答案 (2认同)