测试与RSpec的多态关联

tky*_*mtk 5 rspec ruby-on-rails polymorphic-associations

我正在为多态关联编写RSpec代码.我有两个测试想法

  1. 使用Factory Girl构建多态关联
  2. 使用rails方法构建多态关联.

以下是我编写的代码片段(相关代码位于底部):

1)link_spec.rb,创建与FactoryGirl的关联.

describe "Book links" do
  let(:book) { FactoryGirl.create(:book) }
  let(:book_link) { FactoryGirl.create(:book_link, linkable: book) }

  subject{ book_link }

  it { should be_valid }

  it { should respond_to(:url) }
  it { should respond_to(:linkable) }
  its(:linkable) { should eq book }
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

2)link_spec.rb,通过rails方法创建关联.

describe "Book links" do
  let(:book) { FactoryGirl.create(:book) }
  let(:link) { book.links.create(url: "http://example.com") }

  subject { link }

  it { should be_valid }

  it { should respond_to(:url) }
  it { should respond_to(:linkable) }
  its(:linkable) { should eq book }
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我觉得后者的测试比前者好,但没有信心.或者他们是否相同?


book.rb

class Book < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :links, as: :linkable
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

link.rb

class Link < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :linkable, polymorphic: true
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

factories.rb

factory :book do
  title "Foo bar"
  author "John"
end

factory :book_link, class: "Link" do
  association :linkable, factory: :book
  url "http://examle.com"
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

Pet*_*vin 1

我感觉后者比前者测试得更好,但没有信心。

如果您想含蓄地问哪个“更好”,那么这个问题不太适合 StackOverflow。

或者说它们是等价的吗?

从某种意义上说,设置会导致Link创建相同的对象,我想说的是,它们是等效的。然而,第二个测试为 建立的关联辅助方法Book,您可能会发现这是值得的。