tky*_*mtk 5 rspec ruby-on-rails polymorphic-associations
我正在为多态关联编写RSpec代码.我有两个测试想法
以下是我编写的代码片段(相关代码位于底部):
1)link_spec.rb,创建与FactoryGirl的关联.
describe "Book links" do
let(:book) { FactoryGirl.create(:book) }
let(:book_link) { FactoryGirl.create(:book_link, linkable: book) }
subject{ book_link }
it { should be_valid }
it { should respond_to(:url) }
it { should respond_to(:linkable) }
its(:linkable) { should eq book }
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
2)link_spec.rb,通过rails方法创建关联.
describe "Book links" do
let(:book) { FactoryGirl.create(:book) }
let(:link) { book.links.create(url: "http://example.com") }
subject { link }
it { should be_valid }
it { should respond_to(:url) }
it { should respond_to(:linkable) }
its(:linkable) { should eq book }
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我觉得后者的测试比前者好,但没有信心.或者他们是否相同?
book.rb
class Book < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :links, as: :linkable
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
link.rb
class Link < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :linkable, polymorphic: true
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
factories.rb
factory :book do
title "Foo bar"
author "John"
end
factory :book_link, class: "Link" do
association :linkable, factory: :book
url "http://examle.com"
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我感觉后者比前者测试得更好,但没有信心。
如果您想含蓄地问哪个“更好”,那么这个问题不太适合 StackOverflow。
或者说它们是等价的吗?
从某种意义上说,设置会导致Link创建相同的对象,我想说的是,它们是等效的。然而,第二个测试为 建立的关联辅助方法Book,您可能会发现这是值得的。