Com*_*der 7 c# sockets user-interface asynchronous invokerequired
我正在.Net 2.0中构建一个非可视组件.该组件使用异步套接字(BeginReceive,EndReceive等).异步回调在运行时创建的工作线程的上下文中调用.组件用户不必担心多线程(这是主要目标,我想要的)
组件用户可以在任何线程中创建我的非可视组件(UI线程只是简单应用程序的通用线程.更严重的应用程序可以在任意工作线程中创建组件).组件触发事件,例如"SessionConnected"或"DataAvailable".
问题:由于Async Callbacks和其中引发的事件,事件处理程序在工作线程上下文中执行.我想使用一个中间层,它强制事件处理程序在首先创建组件的线程的上下文中执行.
示例代码(从异常处理等中删除...)
/// <summary>
/// Occurs when the connection is ended
/// </summary>
/// <param name="ar">The IAsyncResult to read the information from</param>
private void EndConnect(IAsyncResult ar)
{
// pass connection status with event
this.Socket.EndConnect(ar);
this.Stream = new NetworkStream(this.Socket);
// -- FIRE CONNECTED EVENT HERE --
// Setup Receive Callback
this.Receive();
}
/// <summary>
/// Occurs when data receive is done; when 0 bytes were received we can assume the connection was closed so we should disconnect
/// </summary>
/// <param name="ar">The IAsyncResult that was used by BeginRead</param>
private void EndReceive(IAsyncResult ar)
{
int nBytes;
nBytes = this.Stream.EndRead(ar);
if (nBytes > 0)
{
// -- FIRE RECEIVED DATA EVENT HERE --
// Setup next Receive Callback
if (this.Connected)
this.Receive();
}
else
{
this.Disconnect();
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
由于Async套接字的性质,使用我的组件的所有应用程序都充斥着"If(this.InvokeRequired){...",我想要的只是用户能够无忧无虑地使用我的组件作为一种丢弃-在.
那么我如何在不要求用户检查InvokeRequired的情况下提升事件(或者换句话说,如何强制在与首先发起事件的线程相同的线程中引发的事件)?
我已经阅读过有关AsyncOperation,BackgroundWorkers,SynchronizingObjects,AsyncCallbacks以及大量其他内容的内容,但这些都让我头晕目眩.
我确实提出了这个,肯定是笨拙的"解决方案",但在某些情况下它似乎失败了(例如当我通过静态类从WinForms项目中调用我的组件时)
/// <summary>
/// Raises an event, ensuring BeginInvoke is called for controls that require invoke
/// </summary>
/// <param name="eventDelegate"></param>
/// <param name="args"></param>
/// <remarks>http://www.eggheadcafe.com/articles/20060727.asp</remarks>
protected void RaiseEvent(Delegate eventDelegate, object[] args)
{
if (eventDelegate != null)
{
try
{
Control ed = eventDelegate.Target as Control;
if ((ed != null) && (ed.InvokeRequired))
ed.Invoke(eventDelegate, args);
else
eventDelegate.DynamicInvoke(args);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Console.WriteLine(ex.GetType());
Console.WriteLine(ex.Message);
//Swallow
}
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
任何帮助,将不胜感激.提前致谢!
编辑:根据这个线程,我最好的选择是使用SyncrhonizationContext.Post,但我看不到如何将它应用于我的情况.
好的; 所以这就是我在阅读更多内容后得到的结果:
public class MyComponent {
private AsyncOperation _asyncOperation;
/// Constructor of my component:
MyComponent() {
_asyncOperation = AsyncOperationManager.CreateOperation(null);
}
/// <summary>
/// Raises an event, ensuring the correct context
/// </summary>
/// <param name="eventDelegate"></param>
/// <param name="args"></param>
protected void RaiseEvent(Delegate eventDelegate, object[] args)
{
if (eventDelegate != null)
{
_asyncOperation.Post(new System.Threading.SendOrPostCallback(
delegate(object argobj)
{
eventDelegate.DynamicInvoke(argobj as object[]);
}), args);
}
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
此处发布的另一个解决方案是一种正在进行中的解决方案。这里发布的解决方案似乎(根据 MSDN)是迄今为止最好的。非常非常欢迎提出建议。
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
2771 次 |
| 最近记录: |