我有一个简单的f#快速排序功能,定义如下:
let rec qsort(xs:List<int>) =
let smaller = xs |> List.filter(fun e -> e < xs.Head)
let larger = xs |> List.filter(fun e -> e > xs.Head)
match xs with
| [] -> []
| _ -> qsort(smaller)@[xs.Head]@qsort(larger)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
在f#中是否有一种方法可以像Haskell一样编写它:
qsort :: [Int] -> [Int]
qsort [] = []
qsort (x:xs) =
qsort smaller ++ [x] ++ qsort larger
where
smaller = [a | a <- xs, a <= x]
larger = [b | b <- xs, b >= x]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我知道f#算法缺少<=和> =.问题更多的是语法/可读性.
谢谢.
cfe*_*ern 13
这是我能想到的最"Haskellian"方式,唯一缺少的是能够将较小/较大的声明声明为'where'子句:
let rec qsort:int list -> int list = function
| [] -> []
| x::xs -> let smaller = [for a in xs do if a<=x then yield a]
let larger = [for b in xs do if b>x then yield b]
qsort smaller @ [x] @ qsort larger
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我知道这不是你问题的一部分,但是我会List.partition在一次传递中以较小/较大的方式拆分列表:
let rec qsort = function
| [] -> []
| x::xs -> let smaller,larger = List.partition (fun y -> y<=x) xs
qsort smaller @ [x] @ qsort larger
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
你想要你的第二个匹配子句x :: xs,并使用你的Haskell示例使用++的@(append)运算符:
let rec qsort xs =
match xs with
| [] -> []
| x :: xs ->
let smaller = qsort (xs |> List.filter(fun e -> e <= x))
let larger = qsort (xs |> List.filter(fun e -> e > x))
smaller @ [x] @ larger
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
它与案例语法中的Haskell定义并不完全相同,但希望对您来说足够相似!
这似乎是尽可能简洁(结合其他答案的想法,并为运营商使用currying):
let rec qsort = function
| [] -> []
| (x:int) :: xs ->
let smaller = List.filter ((>=) x) xs
let larger = List.filter ((<) x) xs
qsort smaller @ [x] @ qsort larger
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
...或者您可以使用CPS进行尾递归qsort:
let qSort lst =
let rec qs l cont =
match l with
| [] -> cont []
| (x::xs) -> qs (List.filter (fun e -> e <= x) xs) (fun smaller ->
qs (List.filter (fun e -> e > x) xs) (fun larger ->
smaller @ (x :: larger) |> cont))
qs lst id
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
3769 次 |
| 最近记录: |