我可以为rdf:List成员指定一个范围吗?

war*_*arp 2 rdf

如果我想说某事的标题应该是rdfs:Literal,我这样做:

example:title a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
    rdfs:range rdfs:Literal .
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

现在我想表达一些东西有一个有序的标题列表:

example:titles a rdf:List .
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

如何指定列表成员应该是什么?我需要子类rdf:List吗?

更新:我想继续使用rdf:List,如果可能,根据Joshua的回答我认为以下说任何rdf:List只有rdfs:Literal值是一个例子:ListOfLiterals,然后我可以用它作为一个范围.

@prefix entity: <http://example.com/stuff/> .
@prefix example: <http://example.com/my/term/> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .

example:ListOfLiterals a owl:Class ;
    owl:equivalentClass [
        a owl:Class ;
        owl:intersectionOf (
            rdf:List
            [
                a owl:Restriction ;
                owl:allValuesFrom rdfs:Literal ;
                owl:onProperty rdf:first
            ]
            [
                a owl:Restriction ;
                owl:allValuesFrom example:ListOfLiterals ;
                owl:onProperty rdf:rest
            ] )
    ] .

example:Book a owl:Class .

example:titles a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
    rdfs:domain example:Book ;
    rdfs:range example:ListOfLiterals .

entity:somebook a example:Book ;
    example:titles ( "Book Title"@en "Second Book Title"@en ) .
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

这有什么意义,还是我误解了什么?

Jos*_*lor 8

首先,请注意rdf:List在OWL代码中使用s意味着您将使用OWL Full,而许多reasoners旨在使用OWL DL.你可能对此感到满意,如果你愿意,那就太好了.如果你需要留在OWL DL,那么你就必须使用自己的词汇列表,例如,一类warp:List和属性warp:firstwarp:rest,并用这些来代替他们的RDF同行.

无论如何,一旦你在你决定List类和你firstrest属性,你可以定义列表类型ListOfElements只能含有一些类的成员Element有下列限制:

元素列表⊑列表(第一个元素)(休息元素列表)

这意味着a ElementList是:(i)a List; (ii)具有该first财产的价值Element; (iii)有一个ElementListas rest,这意味着其余的东西List也必须是Elements.无论nil对象是什么,都应该已声明为a List,但您可能还想包括:

一个元素列表

但这不一定重要.对于您的情况,您需要以TitleList类似的方式定义类,然后将属性的范围声明为TitleList.

这是一个示例本体,包括定义这些List类和ElementList类(在人类可读的Turtle中):

@prefix :      <http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code#> .
@prefix rdfs:  <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl:   <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix xsd:   <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix rdf:   <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .

:rest   a            owl:ObjectProperty ;
        rdfs:domain  :List ;
        rdfs:range   :List .

:List   a       owl:Class .

:nil    a       owl:NamedIndividual , :ElementList , :List .

:ElementList  a          owl:Class ;
        rdfs:subClassOf  [ a                   owl:Class ;
                           owl:intersectionOf  ( :List [ a                  owl:Restriction ;
                                                         owl:allValuesFrom  :Element ;
                                                         owl:onProperty     :first
                                                       ] [ a                  owl:Restriction ;
                                                           owl:allValuesFrom  :ElementList ;
                                                           owl:onProperty     :rest
                                                         ] )
                         ] .

:Element  a     owl:Class .

:first  a            owl:ObjectProperty ;
        rdfs:domain  :List .

<http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code>
        a       owl:Ontology .

[ a                      owl:Axiom ;
  rdfs:comment           "It's probably a good idea to specify that nil is an ElementList.  This could also be inferred, though, if there is a nil-terminated List that is known to be an ElementList." ;
  owl:annotatedProperty  rdf:type ;
  owl:annotatedSource    :nil ;
  owl:annotatedTarget    :ElementList
] .
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

对于完全通用,我已经定义了新的一个新的List类,first并且rest属性和个人nil,但如果OWL Full的是你OK,那么你可以只用rdf:List等为了完整起见,这里是在RDF/XML同一本体:

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
    xmlns="http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"
    xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
  <owl:Ontology rdf:about="http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code"/>
  <owl:Class rdf:about="http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code#List"/>
  <owl:Class rdf:about="http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code#ElementList">
    <rdfs:subClassOf>
      <owl:Class>
        <owl:intersectionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
          <owl:Class rdf:about="http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code#List"/>
          <owl:Restriction>
            <owl:onProperty>
              <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code#first"/>
            </owl:onProperty>
            <owl:allValuesFrom>
              <owl:Class rdf:about="http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code#Element"/>
            </owl:allValuesFrom>
          </owl:Restriction>
          <owl:Restriction>
            <owl:onProperty>
              <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code#rest"/>
            </owl:onProperty>
            <owl:allValuesFrom rdf:resource="http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code#ElementList"/>
          </owl:Restriction>
        </owl:intersectionOf>
      </owl:Class>
    </rdfs:subClassOf>
  </owl:Class>
  <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code#rest">
    <rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code#List"/>
    <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code#List"/>
  </owl:ObjectProperty>
  <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code#first">
    <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code#List"/>
  </owl:ObjectProperty>
  <owl:Axiom>
    <rdfs:comment>It's probably a good idea to specify that nil is an ElementList.  This could also be inferred, though, if there is a nil-terminated List that is known to be an ElementList.</rdfs:comment>
    <owl:annotatedTarget rdf:resource="http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code#ElementList"/>
    <owl:annotatedSource>
      <owl:NamedIndividual rdf:about="http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code#nil">
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code#ElementList"/>
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://stackoverflow.com/a/19480798/1281433/code#List"/>
      </owl:NamedIndividual>
    </owl:annotatedSource>
    <owl:annotatedProperty rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type"/>
  </owl:Axiom>
</rdf:RDF>
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

  • @warp是的,如果你不关心推理机,这应该对你有用。(尽管如此,如果您不使用推理器,只是简单地声明某个列表,例如 IntegerList 不会得到每个成员都是 Integer 的结果;您将需要一个推理器。)如果这有效对于您来说,请考虑[接受它](http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/5234/225437)。如果没有,我们可以做些什么来让它变得更好?:) (2认同)