Pop*_*orn 5 java design-patterns builder
在类外使用构建器模式有什么好处?
课内:
public class Person {
private String name;
private String eyeColor;
private String hairColor;
public Person setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
return this;
}
public Person setEyeColor(String eyeColor) {
this.eyeColor = eyeColor;
return this;
}
public Person setHairColor(String hairColor) {
this.hairColor = hairColor;
return this;
}
}
// Example usage:
Person p = new Person()
.setName("Bob")
.setHairColor("Black")
.setEyeColor("Brown")
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
课外:
public class Person {
private String name;
private String eyeColor;
private String hairColor;
public Person(String name, String eyeColor, String hairColor) {
this.name = name;
this.eyeColor = eyeColor;
this.hairColor = hairColor;
}
}
public class PersonBuilder {
private String name;
private String eyeColor;
private String hairColor;
public Person build() {
return new Person(name, eyeColor, hairColor);
}
public PersonBuilder with(String name) {
this.name = name;
return this;
}
public PersonBuilder setEyeColor(String eyeColor) {
this.eyeColor = eyeColor;
return this;
}
public PersonBuilder setHairColor(String hairColor) {
this.hairColor = hairColor;
return this;
}
}
// Example usage:
Person p = new PersonBuilder()
.setName("Bob")
.setHairColor("Black")
.setEyeColor("Brown")
.build();
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这取决于.
我经常组合Builder和Factory模式,因此将Builder作为外部类是有意义的,因为"构建"对象可能是许多实现之一.这有一个额外的好处,允许实现是包私有或甚至是Builder的私有内部类.
如果您正在使用Builder来使公共类的构造函数更具有意图,或者更加简洁,而不是真正的个人偏好.人们可以权衡在API中增加一个类的优缺点,这可能会让用户感到困惑.
但是,我建议选择其中一个选项并在整个API中坚持使用它.如果所有构建器都是内部类或外部类,它使整个系统架构更容易理解; 不要混合它们.
不要像这样混合内部和外部构建器:
Foo foo = new Foo.Builder(...)
Bar bar = new BarBuilder(...)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
2947 次 |
| 最近记录: |