0 java collections thread-safety getter-setter
这个班是一个单身人士.我不太擅长线程安全.这个类是线程安全的吗?省略了一些方法,但它们仅用于一个线程.这里列出的方法将同时从多个线程访问.
public class TermsDto {
private final static MapSplitter mapSplitter = Splitter
.on(',').trimResults().omitEmptyStrings()
.withKeyValueSeparator(":");
private volatile double factorForOthers = 4;
private volatile Map<String, Double> factorForTermName =
new HashMap<String, Double>();
public void setFactorForOthers(double factorForOthers) {
this.factorForOthers = factorForOthers;
}
public void setFactorForTermNameMapping(String mapping) {
HashMap<String, Double> tempFactorForTermName =
new HashMap<String, Double>();
for (Map.Entry<String, String> entry :
mapSplitter.split(mapping).entrySet()) {
double factor = Double.parseDouble(entry.getValue());
tempFactorForTermName.put(entry.getKey(), factor);
}
factorForTermName = tempFactorForTermName;
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
在您显示的所有代码中,只有这些是相关部分:
private volatile double factorForOthers = 4;
private volatile Map<String, Double> factorForTermName =
new HashMap<String, Double>();
public void setFactorForOthers(double factorForOthers) {
this.factorForOthers = factorForOthers;
}
public void setFactorForTermNameMapping(String mapping) {
HashMap<String, Double> tempFactorForTermName =
new HashMap<String, Double>();
for (Map.Entry<String, String> entry :
mapSplitter.split(mapping).entrySet()) {
double factor = Double.parseDouble(entry.getValue());
tempFactorForTermName.put(entry.getKey(), factor);
}
factorForTermName = tempFactorForTermName;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
方法rank和rankSubtractionByCountsPerDay纯函数,因此根据定义是线程安全的.现在,由于您setFactorForTermNameMapping不依赖于任何共享状态,而只是写入volatile变量,因此它的操作是原子的.
如果你没有显示的方法只读取地图,并且仔细编写factorForTermName 只访问一次,那么整个类可能是线程安全的.