Dra*_*cir 26 .net c# dotnet-httpclient
我想多次发送完全相同的请求,例如:
HttpClient client = new HttpClient();
HttpRequestMessage req = new HttpRequestMessage(HttpMethod.Get, "http://example.com");
await client.SendAsync(req, HttpCompletionOption.ResponseContentRead);
await client.SendAsync(req, HttpCompletionOption.ResponseContentRead);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
第二次发送请求将抛出异常消息:
请求消息已发送.无法多次发送相同的请求消息.
他们是一种" 克隆 "请求的方式,以便我可以再次发送?
我的实际代码HttpRequestMessage在上面的示例中设置了更多变量,变量如header和request方法.
Dra*_*cir 18
我编写了以下扩展方法来克隆请求.
public static HttpRequestMessage Clone(this HttpRequestMessage req)
{
HttpRequestMessage clone = new HttpRequestMessage(req.Method, req.RequestUri);
clone.Content = req.Content;
clone.Version = req.Version;
foreach (KeyValuePair<string, object> prop in req.Properties)
{
clone.Properties.Add(prop);
}
foreach (KeyValuePair<string, IEnumerable<string>> header in req.Headers)
{
clone.Headers.TryAddWithoutValidation(header.Key, header.Value);
}
return clone;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
des*_*lsj 16
这是对@drahcir提出的扩展方法的改进.改进是确保克隆请求的内容以及请求本身:
public static HttpRequestMessage Clone(this HttpRequestMessage request)
{
var clone = new HttpRequestMessage(request.Method, request.RequestUri)
{
Content = request.Content.Clone(),
Version = request.Version
};
foreach (KeyValuePair<string, object> prop in request.Properties)
{
clone.Properties.Add(prop);
}
foreach (KeyValuePair<string, IEnumerable<string>> header in request.Headers)
{
clone.Headers.TryAddWithoutValidation(header.Key, header.Value);
}
return clone;
}
public static HttpContent Clone(this HttpContent content)
{
if (content == null) return null;
var ms = new MemoryStream();
content.CopyToAsync(ms).Wait();
ms.Position = 0;
var clone = new StreamContent(ms);
foreach (KeyValuePair<string, IEnumerable<string>> header in content.Headers)
{
clone.Headers.Add(header.Key, header.Value);
}
return clone;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
编辑05/02/18:这是异步版本
public static Task<HttpRequestMessage> CloneAsync(this HttpRequestMessage request)
{
var clone = new HttpRequestMessage(request.Method, request.RequestUri)
{
Content = await request.Content.CloneAsync().ConfigureAwait(false),
Version = request.Version
};
foreach (KeyValuePair<string, object> prop in request.Properties)
{
clone.Properties.Add(prop);
}
foreach (KeyValuePair<string, IEnumerable<string>> header in request.Headers)
{
clone.Headers.TryAddWithoutValidation(header.Key, header.Value);
}
return clone;
}
public static Task<HttpContent> CloneAsync(this HttpContent content)
{
if (content == null) return null;
var ms = new MemoryStream();
await content.CopyToAsync(ms).ConfigureAwait(false);
ms.Position = 0;
var clone = new StreamContent(ms);
foreach (KeyValuePair<string, IEnumerable<string>> header in content.Headers)
{
clone.Headers.Add(header.Key, header.Value);
}
return clone;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Nic*_*ick 12
我传递的是一个实例,Func<HttpRequestMessage>而不是一个实例HttpRequestMessage.函数指向工厂方法,因此每次调用它时都会收到一条全新的消息,而不是重新使用.
我有类似的问题并以一种黑客方式解决了它,反射。
感谢开源!通过阅读源代码,原来有一个私人领域_sendStatus的HttpRequestMessage课,我所做的是将其重置0重用请求消息之前。它适用于 .NET Core,我希望 Microsoft 永远不会重命名或删除它。:p
// using System.Reflection;
// using System.Net.Http;
// private const string SEND_STATUS_FIELD_NAME = "_sendStatus";
private void ResetSendStatus(HttpRequestMessage request)
{
TypeInfo requestType = request.GetType().GetTypeInfo();
FieldInfo sendStatusField = requestType.GetField(SEND_STATUS_FIELD_NAME, BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.NonPublic);
if (sendStatusField != null)
sendStatusField.SetValue(request, 0);
else
throw new Exception($"Failed to hack HttpRequestMessage, {SEND_STATUS_FIELD_NAME} doesn't exist.");
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)