rti*_*dru 3 c# singleton design-patterns thread-safety
我有一个数据库连接的类实现.现在,这不是标准的SQL数据库.
我需要知道以下是否是一个好的实现,如果不是 - 为什么.
我需要一个带参数的单例类,这就是我设计的方法.
class Connection
{
private string param1;
private string param2;
private static readonly IList<Connection> connections = new List<Connection>();
private Connection()
{
//Prevent instantiation
}
private Connection(string param1, string param2)
{
this.param1 = param1;
this.param2 = param2;
}
public static Connection getInstance(string param1, string param2)
{
foreach(Connection c in connections)
{
if(c.param1 = param1 && c.param2 == param2)
return c;
}
Connection new_conn = new Connection(param1, param2);
connections.Add(new_conn);
return new_conn;
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
它将使用如下:
Connection c = Connection.getInstance(abc, xyz);
Connection d = Conn
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
class Connection
{
private string param1;
private string param2;
private static readonly ConcurrentDictionary<Tuple<string, string, string>, Connection> connections
= new ConcurrentDictionary<Tuple<string, string>, Connection>();
private Connection()
{
//Prevent instantiation
}
private Connection(string param1, string param2)
{
this.param1 = param1;
this.param2 = param2;
}
public static Connection getInstance(string param1, string param2)
{
Connection conn = activeConnections.GetOrAdd(new Tuple<string, string>
param1,param2), new Connection (param1, param2));
return conn;
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
不,它不是线程安全的 - 您在List<T>没有任何同步的情况下进行修改,并且List<T>不是线程安全的.
此外,如果两个调用同时进入,则最终可能会有两个具有相同参数的连接,两个调用都会查看所有现有连接,然后创建一个新连接.
我建议你使用ConcurrentDictionary两个参数的元组键.除此之外,这也会更有效率.
您需要调用GetOrAdd以获取现有连接或创建并添加新连接.