0__*_*0__ 5 macros abstract-class scala
似乎不可能通过def宏实现抽象方法:
import scala.reflect.macros.Context
import language.experimental.macros
trait A {
def foo(): Unit
}
object AImpl {
def fooImpl(c: Context)(): c.Expr[Unit] = {
import c.universe._
c.Expr[Unit](reify().tree)
}
}
trait AImpl extends A {
def foo(): Unit = macro AImpl.fooImpl
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
此操作失败,并显示以下错误:
[error] .../A.scala:17: overriding method foo in trait A of type ()Unit;
[error] macro method foo cannot override an abstract method
[error] def foo(): Unit = macro AImpl.fooImpl
[error] ^
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如果我删除extends A它编译.但显然我想AImpl满足特质A.如何解决这个问题?
另一个尝试:
trait AImpl extends A {
def foo(): Unit = bar()
def bar(): Unit = macro AImpl.fooImpl
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
给出了新的错误:
[error] macro implementation not found: bar (the most common reason for that is that
you cannot use macro implementations in the same compilation run that defines them)
[error] one error found
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
您确定您确实使用先编译的宏和AImpl后编译的宏进行了测试吗?
使用类似于您第二次尝试的转发器方法似乎可行(使用 2.10.2):
// first compilation run
import scala.reflect.macros.Context
import language.experimental.macros
trait A {
def foo(): Unit
}
object AImplMacros {
def fooImpl(c: Context)(): c.Expr[Unit] = {
import c.universe._
c.Expr[Unit](reify().tree)
}
}
// second compilation run
trait AImpl extends A {
def foo(): Unit = bar()
def bar(): Unit = macro AImplMacros.fooImpl
}
// compiles and runs:
scala> val a = new AnyRef with AImpl
a: AImpl = $anon$1@59225446
scala> a.foo
scala> a.bar
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
1465 次 |
| 最近记录: |