我创建了以下FutureTask方法来异步运行方法.
public FutureTask<Object> SendAggregateEventAsync(final
com.Company.Product.SDK.Device.AggregateEvent.ClassObject
request)
{
FutureTask<Object> futureTask;
futureTask = new FutureTask<Object>(new Runnable() {
public void run()
{
try {
SendAggregateEvent(request);
} catch (ResponseException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}, null);
return futureTask;
}
public void SendAggregateEvent(
com.Company.Product.SDK.Device.AggregateEvent.ClassObject
request) throws ResponseException
{
try
{
if(request == null) throw new IllegalArgumentException("request");
String[] s_array = new String[0];
s_array[0] = "EventTime";
String namespace = "http://Product.Company.com/" +
"v1.0/Device/AggregateEvent";
IBindingFactory factory;
factory = BindingDirectory.getFactory(
com.Compant.Product.SDK.Device.AggregateEvent.
ClassObject.class);
String message = ChangeDatesToUTC(MessageHelper.
SerializeObject(factory, request), s_array, namespace);
SendMessage(message);
} catch (JiBXException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
为了编译我必须赶在FutureTask的ResponseException,但至关重要的是,这ResponseException抛出的实现应用程序,而不是由FutureTask抓住.有没有办法解决这个问题,我可以从FutureTask中抛出这个异常?
将Callable传递给构造函数而不是传递Runnable,您将不再需要捕获异常:
futureTask = new FutureTask<Object>(new Callable() {
public Object call() throws ResponseException {
SendAggregateEvent(request);
return null;
}
};
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
(但FutureTask的泛型类型应该是Void
而不是Object
).
如果抛出ResponseException ,则FutureTask call()
的get()
方法将抛出ExecutionException,并且此异常的原因将是ResponseException.
那就是说,你不应该简单地将Callable提交给ExecutorService,让它为你创造一个未来吗?还要尝试尊重Java命名约定,并从方法中删除throws子句,因为它不会抛出任何异常.命名也很糟糕:你的方法不会发送任何东西.它只创建一个FutureTask,在执行时会发送一个事件.