dav*_*v_i 12 c# linq linq-to-sql
反正有没有做LINQ2SQL查询做类似的事情:
var result = source.GroupBy(a => new { a.Column1, a.Column2 });
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
要么
var result = from s in source
group s by new { s.Column1, s.Column2 } into c
select new { Column1 = c.Key.Column1, Column2 = c.Key.Column2 };
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但忽略了分组列内容的情况?
Nav*_*hat 27
您可以传递StringComparer.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase给GroupBy扩展方法.
var result = source.GroupBy(a => new { a.Column1, a.Column2 },
StringComparer.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
或者你可以ToUpperInvariant按照Hamlet Hakobyan的建议在每个领域使用评论.我建议ToUpperInvariant还是ToUpper而非ToLower或者ToLowerInvariant因为它是对程序性比较的目的进行了优化.
我无法让NaveenBhat的解决方案工作,收到编译错误:
无法从用法中推断出方法'System.Linq.Enumerable.GroupBy(System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable,System.Func,System.Collections.Generic.IEqualityComparer)'的类型参数.尝试显式指定类型参数.
为了使它工作,我发现最简单和最清楚的是定义一个新类来存储我的键列(GroupKey),然后是一个实现IEqualityComparer(KeyComparer)的单独类.然后我可以打电话
var result= source.GroupBy(r => new GroupKey(r), new KeyComparer());
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
KeyComparer类确实将字符串与InvariantCultureIgnoreCase比较器进行比较,因此感谢NaveenBhat将我指向正确的方向.
我的课程的简化版本:
private class GroupKey
{
public string Column1{ get; set; }
public string Column2{ get; set; }
public GroupKey(SourceObject r) {
this.Column1 = r.Column1;
this.Column2 = r.Column2;
}
}
private class KeyComparer: IEqualityComparer<GroupKey>
{
bool IEqualityComparer<GroupKey>.Equals(GroupKey x, GroupKey y)
{
if (!x.Column1.Equals(y.Column1,StringComparer.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase) return false;
if (!x.Column2.Equals(y.Column2,StringComparer.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase) return false;
return true;
//my actual code is more complex than this, more columns to compare
//and handles null strings, but you get the idea.
}
int IEqualityComparer<GroupKey>.GetHashCode(GroupKey obj)
{
return 0.GetHashCode() ; // forces calling Equals
//Note, it would be more efficient to do something like
//string hcode = Column1.ToLower() + Column2.ToLower();
//return hcode.GetHashCode();
//but my object is more complex than this simplified example
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)