isPalindrome :: [a] -> Bool
isPalindrome xs = case xs of
[] -> True
[x] -> True
a -> (last a) == (head a) && (isPalindrome (drop 1 (take (length a - 1) a)))
main = do
print (show (isPalindrome "blaho"))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
结果是
No instance for (Eq a)
arising from a use of `=='
In the first argument of `(&&)', namely `(last a) == (head a)'
In the expression:
(last a) == (head a)
&& (isPalindrome (drop 1 (take (length a - 1) a)))
In a case alternative:
a -> (last a) == (head a)
&& (isPalindrome (drop 1 (take (length a - 1) a)))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
为什么会出现此错误?
ham*_*mar 31
你比较型的两个项目a使用==.这意味着a不能仅仅是任何类型-它必须是一个实例Eq,作为类型==为(==) :: Eq a => a -> a -> Bool.
您可以通过Eq在a函数的类型签名上添加约束来解决此问题:
isPalindrome :: Eq a => [a] -> Bool
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
顺便说一下,有一种更简单的方法来实现这个功能reverse.
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
14750 次 |
| 最近记录: |