Den*_*ret 137 arrays for-loop go
我想我有这些类型:
type Attribute struct {
Key, Val string
}
type Node struct {
Attr []Attribute
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
并且我想迭代我的节点的属性来改变它们.
我本以为能够做到:
for _, attr := range n.Attr {
if attr.Key == "href" {
attr.Val = "something"
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但由于attr不是指针,这不起作用,我必须这样做:
for i, attr := range n.Attr {
if attr.Key == "href" {
n.Attr[i].Val = "something"
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
有更简单或更快的方式吗?有可能直接从指针中获取指针range吗?
显然,我不想仅仅为迭代更改结构,更详细的解决方案不是解决方案.
nem*_*emo 133
不,你想要的缩写是不可能的.
这样做的原因是range复制您正在迭代的切片中的值.关于范围的规范说:
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)Range expression 1st value 2nd value (if 2nd variable is present) array or slice a [n]E, *[n]E, or []E index i int a[i] E
因此,范围a[i]用作数组/切片的第二个值,这实际上意味着复制值,使原始值不可触及.
以下代码演示了此行为:
x := make([]int, 3)
x[0], x[1], x[2] = 1, 2, 3
for i, val := range x {
println(&x[i], "vs.", &val)
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
代码为范围内的值和切片中的实际值打印完全不同的内存位置:
0xf84000f010 vs. 0x7f095ed0bf68
0xf84000f014 vs. 0x7f095ed0bf68
0xf84000f018 vs. 0x7f095ed0bf68
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
所以你唯一能做的就是使用指针或索引,就像jnml和peterSO已经提出的那样.
pet*_*rSO 33
你似乎在寻求与此相当的东西:
package main
import "fmt"
type Attribute struct {
Key, Val string
}
type Node struct {
Attr []Attribute
}
func main() {
n := Node{
[]Attribute{
{"key", "value"},
{"href", "http://www.google.com"},
},
}
fmt.Println(n)
for i := 0; i < len(n.Attr); i++ {
attr := &n.Attr[i]
if attr.Key == "href" {
attr.Val = "something"
}
}
fmt.Println(n)
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
输出:
{[{key value} {href http://www.google.com}]}
{[{key value} {href something}]}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这避免Attribute了以切片边界检查为代价创建类型值的可能较大的副本.在您的示例中,类型Attribute相对较小,两个string切片引用:64位体系结构计算机上的2*3*8 = 48个字节.
你也可以简单地写:
for i := 0; i < len(n.Attr); i++ {
if n.Attr[i].Key == "href" {
n.Attr[i].Val = "something"
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但是,使用range子句获取等效结果的方法是:创建副本但最小化切片边界检查,是:
for i, attr := range n.Attr {
if attr.Key == "href" {
n.Attr[i].Val = "something"
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Pau*_*kin 20
我会调整你的最后一个建议,并使用范围的索引版本.
for i := range n.Attr {
if n.Attr[i].Key == "href" {
n.Attr[i].Val = "something"
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
对于我来说,n.Attr[i]在测试Key行和设置行中明确地引用它似乎更简单Val,而不是attr用于一个和n.Attr[i]另一个.
zzz*_*zzz 14
例如:
package main
import "fmt"
type Attribute struct {
Key, Val string
}
type Node struct {
Attr []*Attribute
}
func main() {
n := Node{[]*Attribute{
&Attribute{"foo", ""},
&Attribute{"href", ""},
&Attribute{"bar", ""},
}}
for _, attr := range n.Attr {
if attr.Key == "href" {
attr.Val = "something"
}
}
for _, v := range n.Attr {
fmt.Printf("%#v\n", *v)
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
产量
main.Attribute{Key:"foo", Val:""}
main.Attribute{Key:"href", Val:"something"}
main.Attribute{Key:"bar", Val:""}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
替代方法:
package main
import "fmt"
type Attribute struct {
Key, Val string
}
type Node struct {
Attr []Attribute
}
func main() {
n := Node{[]Attribute{
{"foo", ""},
{"href", ""},
{"bar", ""},
}}
for i := range n.Attr {
attr := &n.Attr[i]
if attr.Key == "href" {
attr.Val = "something"
}
}
for _, v := range n.Attr {
fmt.Printf("%#v\n", v)
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
输出:
main.Attribute{Key:"foo", Val:""}
main.Attribute{Key:"href", Val:"something"}
main.Attribute{Key:"bar", Val:""}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)