R tm包用于预测分析.如何对新文档进行分类?

Dr *_*mas 15 r tm

这是关于文本挖掘程序的一般性问题.假设有一个文件语料库被归类为Spam/No_Spam.作为标准程序,可以预先处理数据,删除标点,停止单词等.将其转换为DocumentTermMatrix后,可以构建一些模型来预测垃圾邮件/ No_Spam.这是我的问题.现在我想使用为新文档建立的模型到达.为了检查单个文档,我必须构建DocumentTerm*Vector*?所以它可以用来预测垃圾邮件/ No_Spam.在tm的文档中,我发现使用例如tfidf权重将完整的语料库转换为矩阵.如何使用Corpus中的idf转换单个向量?我是否必须每次更改语料库并构建新的DocumentTermMatrix?我处理了我的语料库,将其转换为矩阵,然后将其拆分为训练和测试集.但是这里测试集与整个文档矩阵建立在同一行.我可以检查精度等,但不知道什么是新文本分类的最佳程序.

Ben,想象一下,我有一个预处理的DocumentTextMatrix,我将它转换为data.frame.

dtm <- DocumentTermMatrix(CorpusProc,control = list(weighting =function(x) weightTfIdf(x, normalize =FALSE),stopwords = TRUE, wordLengths=c(3, Inf), bounds = list(global = c(4,Inf))))

dtmDataFrame <- as.data.frame(inspect(dtm))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

添加了因子变量并构建了模型.

Corpus.svm<-svm(Risk_Category~.,data=dtmDataFrame)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

现在想象一下,我给你一个新文件d(以前不在你的语料库中),你想知道模型预测垃圾邮件/ No_Spam.你如何做到这一点?

好的,我们根据这里使用的代码创建一个示例.

examp1 <- "When discussing performance with colleagues, teaching, sending a bug report or searching for guidance on mailing lists and here on SO, a reproducible example is often asked and always helpful. What are your tips for creating an excellent example? How do you paste data structures from r in a text format? What other information should you include? Are there other tricks in addition to using dput(), dump() or structure()? When should you include library() or require() statements? Which reserved words should one avoid, in addition to c, df, data, etc? How does one make a great r reproducible example?"
examp2 <- "Sometimes the problem really isn't reproducible with a smaller piece of data, no matter how hard you try, and doesn't happen with synthetic data (although it's useful to show how you produced synthetic data sets that did not reproduce the problem, because it rules out some hypotheses). Posting the data to the web somewhere and providing a URL may be necessary. If the data can't be released to the public at large but could be shared at all, then you may be able to offer to e-mail it to interested parties (although this will cut down the number of people who will bother to work on it). I haven't actually seen this done, because people who can't release their data are sensitive about releasing it any form, but it would seem plausible that in some cases one could still post data if it were sufficiently anonymized/scrambled/corrupted slightly in some way. If you can't do either of these then you probably need to hire a consultant to solve your problem" 
examp3 <- "You are most likely to get good help with your R problem if you provide a reproducible example. A reproducible example allows someone else to recreate your problem by just copying and pasting R code. There are four things you need to include to make your example reproducible: required packages, data, code, and a description of your R environment. Packages should be loaded at the top of the script, so it's easy to see which ones the example needs. The easiest way to include data in an email is to use dput() to generate the R code to recreate it. For example, to recreate the mtcars dataset in R, I'd perform the following steps: Run dput(mtcars) in R Copy the output In my reproducible script, type mtcars <- then paste. Spend a little bit of time ensuring that your code is easy for others to read: make sure you've used spaces and your variable names are concise, but informative, use comments to indicate where your problem lies, do your best to remove everything that is not related to the problem. The shorter your code is, the easier it is to understand. Include the output of sessionInfo() as a comment. This summarises your R environment and makes it easy to check if you're using an out-of-date package. You can check you have actually made a reproducible example by starting up a fresh R session and pasting your script in. Before putting all of your code in an email, consider putting it on http://gist.github.com/. It will give your code nice syntax highlighting, and you don't have to worry about anything getting mangled by the email system."
examp4 <- "Do your homework before posting: If it is clear that you have done basic background research, you are far more likely to get an informative response. See also Further Resources further down this page. Do help.search(keyword) and apropos(keyword) with different keywords (type this at the R prompt). Do RSiteSearch(keyword) with different keywords (at the R prompt) to search R functions, contributed packages and R-Help postings. See ?RSiteSearch for further options and to restrict searches. Read the online help for relevant functions (type ?functionname, e.g., ?prod, at the R prompt) If something seems to have changed in R, look in the latest NEWS file on CRAN for information about it. Search the R-faq and the R-windows-faq if it might be relevant (http://cran.r-project.org/faqs.html) Read at least the relevant section in An Introduction to R If the function is from a package accompanying a book, e.g., the MASS package, consult the book before posting. The R Wiki has a section on finding functions and documentation"
examp5 <- "Before asking a technical question by e-mail, or in a newsgroup, or on a website chat board, do the following:  Try to find an answer by searching the archives of the forum you plan to post to. Try to find an answer by searching the Web. Try to find an answer by reading the manual. Try to find an answer by reading a FAQ. Try to find an answer by inspection or experimentation. Try to find an answer by asking a skilled friend. If you're a programmer, try to find an answer by reading the source code. When you ask your question, display the fact that you have done these things first; this will help establish that you're not being a lazy sponge and wasting people's time. Better yet, display what you have learned from doing these things. We like answering questions for people who have demonstrated they can learn from the answers. Use tactics like doing a Google search on the text of whatever error message you get (searching Google groups as well as Web pages). This might well take you straight to fix documentation or a mailing list thread answering your question. Even if it doesn't, saying “I googled on the following phrase but didn't get anything that looked promising” is a good thing to do in e-mail or news postings requesting help, if only because it records what searches won't help. It will also help to direct other people with similar problems to your thread by linking the search terms to what will hopefully be your problem and resolution thread. Take your time. Do not expect to be able to solve a complicated problem with a few seconds of Googling. Read and understand the FAQs, sit back, relax and give the problem some thought before approaching experts. Trust us, they will be able to tell from your questions how much reading and thinking you did, and will be more willing to help if you come prepared. Don't instantly fire your whole arsenal of questions just because your first search turned up no answers (or too many). Prepare your question. Think it through. Hasty-sounding questions get hasty answers, or none at all. The more you do to demonstrate that having put thought and effort into solving your problem before seeking help, the more likely you are to actually get help. Beware of asking the wrong question. If you ask one that is based on faulty assumptions, J. Random Hacker is quite likely to reply with a uselessly literal answer while thinking Stupid question..., and hoping the experience of getting what you asked for rather than what you needed will teach you a lesson."



corpus2 <- Corpus(VectorSource(c(examp1, examp2, examp3, examp4)))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

注意我拿出了例子5

skipWords <- function(x) removeWords(x, stopwords("english"))
funcs <- list(tolower, removePunctuation, removeNumbers, stripWhitespace, skipWords)
corpus2.proc <- tm_map(corpus2, FUN = tm_reduce, tmFuns = funcs)

corpus2a.dtm <- DocumentTermMatrix(corpus2.proc, control = list(wordLengths = c(3,10)))
dtmDataFrame <- as.data.frame(inspect(corpus2a.dtm)) 
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

添加了一个因子变量Spam_Classification 2级垃圾邮件/ No_Spam

dtmFinal<-cbind(dtmDataFrame,Spam_Classification)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我建立了一个模型SVM Corpus.svm <-svm(Spam_Category~.,data = dtmFinal)

现在假设我将示例5作为新文档(电子邮件)如何生成垃圾邮件/ No_Spam值???

Ben*_*Ben 0

目前尚不清楚您的问题是什么或您正在寻找什么样的答案。

\n\n

假设您问“如何获取“DocumentTermVector”来传递给其他函数?”,这是一种方法。

\n\n

一些可重现的数据:

\n\n
examp1 <- "When discussing performance with colleagues, teaching, sending a bug report or searching for guidance on mailing lists and here on SO, a reproducible example is often asked and always helpful. What are your tips for creating an excellent example? How do you paste data structures from r in a text format? What other information should you include? Are there other tricks in addition to using dput(), dump() or structure()? When should you include library() or require() statements? Which reserved words should one avoid, in addition to c, df, data, etc? How does one make a great r reproducible example?"\nexamp2 <- "Sometimes the problem really isn\'t reproducible with a smaller piece of data, no matter how hard you try, and doesn\'t happen with synthetic data (although it\'s useful to show how you produced synthetic data sets that did not reproduce the problem, because it rules out some hypotheses). Posting the data to the web somewhere and providing a URL may be necessary. If the data can\'t be released to the public at large but could be shared at all, then you may be able to offer to e-mail it to interested parties (although this will cut down the number of people who will bother to work on it). I haven\'t actually seen this done, because people who can\'t release their data are sensitive about releasing it any form, but it would seem plausible that in some cases one could still post data if it were sufficiently anonymized/scrambled/corrupted slightly in some way. If you can\'t do either of these then you probably need to hire a consultant to solve your problem" \nexamp3 <- "You are most likely to get good help with your R problem if you provide a reproducible example. A reproducible example allows someone else to recreate your problem by just copying and pasting R code. There are four things you need to include to make your example reproducible: required packages, data, code, and a description of your R environment. Packages should be loaded at the top of the script, so it\'s easy to see which ones the example needs. The easiest way to include data in an email is to use dput() to generate the R code to recreate it. For example, to recreate the mtcars dataset in R, I\'d perform the following steps: Run dput(mtcars) in R Copy the output In my reproducible script, type mtcars <- then paste. Spend a little bit of time ensuring that your code is easy for others to read: make sure you\'ve used spaces and your variable names are concise, but informative, use comments to indicate where your problem lies, do your best to remove everything that is not related to the problem. The shorter your code is, the easier it is to understand. Include the output of sessionInfo() as a comment. This summarises your R environment and makes it easy to check if you\'re using an out-of-date package. You can check you have actually made a reproducible example by starting up a fresh R session and pasting your script in. Before putting all of your code in an email, consider putting it on http://gist.github.com/. It will give your code nice syntax highlighting, and you don\'t have to worry about anything getting mangled by the email system."\nexamp4 <- "Do your homework before posting: If it is clear that you have done basic background research, you are far more likely to get an informative response. See also Further Resources further down this page. Do help.search(keyword) and apropos(keyword) with different keywords (type this at the R prompt). Do RSiteSearch(keyword) with different keywords (at the R prompt) to search R functions, contributed packages and R-Help postings. See ?RSiteSearch for further options and to restrict searches. Read the online help for relevant functions (type ?functionname, e.g., ?prod, at the R prompt) If something seems to have changed in R, look in the latest NEWS file on CRAN for information about it. Search the R-faq and the R-windows-faq if it might be relevant (http://cran.r-project.org/faqs.html) Read at least the relevant section in An Introduction to R If the function is from a package accompanying a book, e.g., the MASS package, consult the book before posting. The R Wiki has a section on finding functions and documentation"\nexamp5 <- "Before asking a technical question by e-mail, or in a newsgroup, or on a website chat board, do the following:  Try to find an answer by searching the archives of the forum you plan to post to. Try to find an answer by searching the Web. Try to find an answer by reading the manual. Try to find an answer by reading a FAQ. Try to find an answer by inspection or experimentation. Try to find an answer by asking a skilled friend. If you\'re a programmer, try to find an answer by reading the source code. When you ask your question, display the fact that you have done these things first; this will help establish that you\'re not being a lazy sponge and wasting people\'s time. Better yet, display what you have learned from doing these things. We like answering questions for people who have demonstrated they can learn from the answers. Use tactics like doing a Google search on the text of whatever error message you get (searching Google groups as well as Web pages). This might well take you straight to fix documentation or a mailing list thread answering your question. Even if it doesn\'t, saying \xe2\x80\x9cI googled on the following phrase but didn\'t get anything that looked promising\xe2\x80\x9d is a good thing to do in e-mail or news postings requesting help, if only because it records what searches won\'t help. It will also help to direct other people with similar problems to your thread by linking the search terms to what will hopefully be your problem and resolution thread. Take your time. Do not expect to be able to solve a complicated problem with a few seconds of Googling. Read and understand the FAQs, sit back, relax and give the problem some thought before approaching experts. Trust us, they will be able to tell from your questions how much reading and thinking you did, and will be more willing to help if you come prepared. Don\'t instantly fire your whole arsenal of questions just because your first search turned up no answers (or too many). Prepare your question. Think it through. Hasty-sounding questions get hasty answers, or none at all. The more you do to demonstrate that having put thought and effort into solving your problem before seeking help, the more likely you are to actually get help. Beware of asking the wrong question. If you ask one that is based on faulty assumptions, J. Random Hacker is quite likely to reply with a uselessly literal answer while thinking Stupid question..., and hoping the experience of getting what you asked for rather than what you needed will teach you a lesson."\n
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)\n\n

从这些文本创建一个语料库:

\n\n
corpus2 <- Corpus(VectorSource(c(examp1, examp2, examp3, examp4, examp5)))\n
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)\n\n

流程文字:

\n\n
skipWords <- function(x) removeWords(x, stopwords("english"))\nfuncs <- list(tolower, removePunctuation, removeNumbers, stripWhitespace, skipWords)\ncorpus2.proc <- tm_map(corpus2, FUN = tm_reduce, tmFuns = funcs)\n
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)\n\n

将处理后的语料库转换为术语文档矩阵:

\n\n
corpus2a.dtm <- DocumentTermMatrix(corpus2.proc, control = list(wordLengths = c(3,10)))\ninspect(corpus2a.dtm)\n\nA document-term matrix (5 documents, 273 terms)\n\nNon-/sparse entries: 314/1051\nSparsity           : 77%\nMaximal term length: 10 \nWeighting          : term frequency (tf)\n\n    Terms\nDocs able actually addition allows answer answering answers archives are arsenal avoid background based\n   1    0        0        2      0      0         0       0        0   1       0     1          0     0\n   2    1        1        0      0      0         0       0        0   0       0     0          0     0\n   3    0        1        0      1      0         0       0        0   0       0     0          0     0\n   4    0        0        0      0      0         0       0        0   0       0     0          1     0\n   5    2        1        0      0      8         2       3        1   0       1     0          0     1\n
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)\n\n

这是获取您所引用的“DocumentTerm*Vector*”的关键行:

\n\n
# access vector of first document in the dtm\nas.matrix(corpus2a.dtm)[1,]\n\nable   actually   addition     allows     answer  answering    answers   archives        are \n         0          0          2          0          0          0          0          0          1 \n   arsenal      avoid background      based      basic     before     better     beware        bit \n         0          1          0          0          0          0          0          0          0 \n     board       book     bother        bug    changed       chat      check       \n
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)\n\n

事实上,它是一个命名数字,对于传递给其他函数等应该很有用,这看起来就像您想要做的:

\n\n
str(as.matrix(corpus2a.dtm)[1,])\n Named num [1:273] 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ...\n
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)\n\n

如果您只想要一个数字向量,请尝试as.numeric(as.matrix(corpus2a.dtm)[1,]))

\n\n

这就是你想做的吗?

\n

  • 好吧,我不想每次收到新电子邮件时都更改语料库,它会更改所有基于 tfidf 数字的矩阵。当然,我每次都必须构建一个新的 SVM。这就是问题所在。我想输入新电子邮件,进行预处理并构建一个具有相同矩阵列的 1 行向量,从新文档中获取 tf,从语料库中获取 idf。并用它来预测垃圾邮件/No_Spam。我不知道这里是否有标准程序,或者完成它的函数,或者必须编码。 (2认同)