性能问题:"java.text.MessageFormat.format"vs"StringBuilder"

use*_*287 7 java performance-testing

我想知道比较MessageFormatStringBuilder上课.假设一个例子我有一个字符串.对于性能明智的哪一个是快速的: java.text.MessageFormat.formatStringBuilder("Test ").append("Hello ")

String txt = java.text.MessageFormat.format("Test {0}"," Hello") 
String txt1=   new StringBuilder("Test ").append("Hello ")
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我只是想知道在最佳实践或性能明智的情况下使用哪一个

bsi*_*nau 14

亲自尝试一下:

long start = System.nanoTime();
String txt = MessageFormat.format("Test {0}"," Hello");
System.out.println("MessageFormat: " + (System.nanoTime() - start) + " ns");

start = System.nanoTime();
String txt1 = new StringBuilder("Test ").append("Hello").toString();
System.out.println("StringBuilder: " + (System.nanoTime() - start) + " ns");
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

输出:

MessageFormat:1125974 ns

StringBuilder:16705 ns

结论:

StringBuilder 工作得快得多,因为它只是为现有数组添加了一些字符.


Jav*_*ier 3

StringBuilder只将文本附加到动态缓冲区,而MessageFormat必须在附加数据之前解析给定的格式,然后StringBuilderMessageFormat.