Fra*_*ter 4 libsvm scikit-learn
对于相同的数据集和参数,我得到不同的准确性LibSVM和scikit-learn的SVM实现,尽管scikit-learn也使用LibSVM在内部.
我忽略了什么?
LibSVM命令行版本:
me@my-compyter:~/Libraries/libsvm-3.16$ ./svm-train -c 1 -g 0.07 heart_scale heart_scale.model
optimization finished, #iter = 134
nu = 0.433785
obj = -101.855060, rho = 0.426412
nSV = 130, nBSV = 107
Total nSV = 130
me@my-compyter:~/Libraries/libsvm-3.16$ ./svm-predict heart_scale heart_scale.model heart_scale.result
Accuracy = 86.6667% (234/270) (classification)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Scikit-learn NuSVC版本:
In [1]: from sklearn.datasets import load_svmlight_file
In [2]: X_train, y_train = load_svmlight_file('heart_scale')
In [3]: from sklearn import svm
In [4]: clf = svm.NuSVC(gamma=0.07,verbose=True)
In [5]: clf.fit(X_train,y_train)
[LibSVM]*
optimization finished, #iter = 118
C = 0.479830
obj = 9.722436, rho = -0.224096
nSV = 145, nBSV = 125
Total nSV = 145
Out[5]: NuSVC(cache_size=200, coef0=0.0, degree=3, gamma=0.07, kernel='rbf',
max_iter=-1, nu=0.5, probability=False, shrinking=True, tol=0.001,
verbose=True)
In [6]: pred = clf.predict(X_train)
In [7]: from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score
In [8]: accuracy_score(y_train, pred)
Out[8]: 0.8481481481481481
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Scikit-learn SVC版本:
In [1]: from sklearn.datasets import load_svmlight_file
In [2]: X_train, y_train = load_svmlight_file('heart_scale')
In [3]: from sklearn import svm
In [4]: clf = svm.SVC(gamma=0.07,C=1, verbose=True)
In [5]: clf.fit(X_train,y_train)
[LibSVM]*
optimization finished, #iter = 153
obj = -101.855059, rho = -0.426465
nSV = 130, nBSV = 107
Total nSV = 130
Out[5]: SVC(C=1, cache_size=200, class_weight=None, coef0=0.0, degree=3, gamma=0.07,
kernel='rbf', max_iter=-1, probability=False, shrinking=True, tol=0.001,
verbose=True)
In [6]: pred = clf.predict(X_train)
In [7]: from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score
In [8]: accuracy_score(y_train, pred)
Out[8]: 0.8666666666666667
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Update1:将scikit-learn示例从SVR更新为NuSVC,请参阅ogrisel的回答
Update2:添加了输出verbose=True
Update3:添加了scikit-learn SVC版本
所以看起来我的问题已经解决了.如果我使用SVC与C=1不NuSVC我得到了相同的结果LIBSVM,但有人可以解释为什么NuSVC和SVC(C = 1)给出不同的结果,虽然,他们应该这样做(见ogrisel的答案)?
SVR是回归模型,而不是分类模型.svm-train -c 1是可用作sklearn.svm.NuSVC类的Nu-SVC模型.
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
3939 次 |
| 最近记录: |