C++ std :: unordered_set SIGFPE异常

Question

我写了一个程序,我很开心我已经运行了几十次 - 我甚至写下了多次执行的结果 - 现在它不起作用.

你可能会认为我说风筝很高,或者我可能只是改变了一些线条,但我真的不记得在程序上做了任何改动.

根据输入,问题是a SIGFPE,在程序的不同执行中会增加.虽然在插入值时std::unordered_set<Point<T> *>引发了信号但是会发生.

这是我执行此类插入的代码片段:

std::vector<Point<T> *> _point, _centroid;
std::vector<std::unordered_set<Point<T> *> > _cluster;

// Main procedure -- pseudocode
for (point in _point) {
    cluster_id = centroid_with_min_distance(point, _centroid);
    has_changed = _change_cluster(point, cluster_id);
}

// Changes from one "point->_cluster's unordered_set" to "c's unordered_set"
bool _change_cluster(Point<T> *point, const unsigned int& c) {

    if ((point->_cluster == c) &&
        (_cluster[c].find(point) != _cluster[c].end())) {
        return false;
    }

    _cluster[point->_cluster].erase(point);
    _cluster[c].insert(point); // Insertion that raises the SIGFPE exception
    point->_cluster = c;
    return true;

}

这是valgrind输出的一个重要部分:

==17636== Invalid read of size 8
==17636==    at 0x40A758: std::pair<std::__detail::_Hashtable_iterator<
                Point<unsigned int>*, true, false>, bool>
                std::_Hashtable<Point<unsigned int>*, Point<unsigned int>*,
                std::allocator<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                std::_Identity<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                std::equal_to<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                std::hash<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing,
                std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash,
                std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, false, true, true>::
                    _M_insert<Point<unsigned int>* const&>(
                        Point<unsigned int>* const&&&,
                        std::integral_constant<bool, true>) (hashtable.h:966)
==17636==    by 0x408EDA: std::_Hashtable<Point<unsigned int>*,
                 Point<unsigned int>*, std::allocator<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                 std::_Identity<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                 std::equal_to<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                 std::hash<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                 std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing,
                 std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash,
                 std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, false, true, true>::
                     insert(Point<unsigned int>* const&) (hashtable.h:400)
==17636==  ... (calls from my program) ...
==17636==  Address 0x620a028 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==17636== 
==17636== 
==17636== Process terminating with default action of signal 8 (SIGFPE)
==17636==  Integer divide by zero at address 0x402D07D7C
==17636==    at 0x40252F: std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing::operator()(
                 unsigned long, unsigned long) const (hashtable_policy.h:376)
==17636==    by 0x40A66C: std::__detail::_Hash_code_base<Point<unsigned int>*,
                 Point<unsigned int>*, std::_Identity<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                 std::equal_to<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                 std::hash<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                 std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing,
                 std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, false>::_M_bucket_index(
                     Point<unsigned int>* const&, unsigned long,
                     unsigned long) const (hashtable_policy.h:758)
==17636==    by 0x40A772: std::pair<std::__detail::_Hashtable_iterator<
                 Point<unsigned int>*, true, false>, bool>
                 std::_Hashtable<Point<unsigned int>*, Point<unsigned int>*,
                 std::allocator<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                 std::_Identity<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                 std::equal_to<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                 std::hash<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                 std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing,
                 std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash,
                 std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, false, true, true>::
                     _M_insert<Point<unsigned int>* const&>(
                     Point<unsigned int>* const&&&,
                     std::integral_constant<bool, true>) (hashtable.h:966)
==17636==    by 0x408EDA: std::_Hashtable<Point<unsigned int>*,
                 Point<unsigned int>*, std::allocator<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                 std::_Identity<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                 std::equal_to<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                 std::hash<Point<unsigned int>*>,
                 std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing,
                 std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash,
                 std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, false, true, true>::
                     insert(Point<unsigned int>* const&) (hashtable.h:400)
==17636==    ... (calls from my program) ...

这里的问题是:因为我在我的程序中有计算可能导致除以零 - 它们与此过程没有直接关系 - 但是,错误是否可能被插入阴影？或者我应该在插入指针时做一些额外的处理std::unordered_set<T>？

我正在编译程序x86_64 GNU/Linux,我正在使用g++ (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3.

Answer 1

我怀疑'c'超出范围_cluster.你可以更换所有的_cluster[c]用_cluster.at(c),看看如果发现有超出范围的错误.

valgrind输出表明它是无效读取,后跟整数模数误差.既然它正在做hash_code % bucket_count,我怀疑你访问了向量的范围.

顺便说一下,命名开头的东西_可能有风险,就像它在全局命名空间中一样,它在技术上保留用于实现.