Jongo vs(DBObject)JSON.parse

Vla*_*mir 5 java mongodb jongo

我试图找出Jongo的优势而不是简单地使用(DBObject)JSON.parse(...)解组json命令并以下面的方式使用DBObject.

有性能优势吗?

    @Override
public List<T> getEntityList(Integer limit, String query) throws Exception {
    log.entering(DaoImpl.class.toString(), "getEntityList, with criteria of " + query);
    DBObject criteriaObject = null;
    ArrayList<T> list = new ArrayList<T>();

    if (query != null)
        criteriaObject = (DBObject)JSON.parse(query);

    DBCursor cursor = null;

    try {
        if (criteriaObject != null) {
            log.log(Level.FINEST, "getting the objects using a search criteria: " + criteriaObject);
            cursor = MongoDB.getInstance().getCollection(collection).find(criteriaObject);
        } else {
            log.log(Level.FINEST, "getting the objects without a criteria");
            cursor = MongoDB.getInstance().getCollection(collection).find();
        }

        ............etc, etc, etc
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

谢谢!

yve*_*lem 2

Jongo .3 解组 Mongo 查询与相同JSON.parse(query)。优点是从数据库获取结果的方式。在您的示例中,您必须迭代游标,自行调整每个属性和子属性。

DBObject dbo = JSON.parse("{age: 18}");
DBCursor results = users.find(dbo);
for (DBObject result : results) {
    User user = new User();
    user.setUsername((String) result.get("username"));
    user.setAge((Integer) result.get("age"));
    user.setAddress(new Address(..));
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

使用 Jongo,您可以直接操作对象:

Iterable<User> users = collection.find("{age: 18}").as(User.class);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

Jongo 的表现几乎与车手持平。