鉴于:
A = [['Yes', 'lala', 'No'], ['Yes', 'lala', 'Idontknow'], ['No', 'lala', 'Yes'], ['No', 'lala', 'Idontknow']]
我想知道['Yes', X, 'No']A中是否存在,X我不关心的地方.
我试过:
valid = False
for n in A:
if n[0] == 'Yes' and n[2] == 'No':
valid = True
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我知道set()在这种情况下很有用.但是怎么做呢?这可能吗?或者我最好坚持原始代码?
如果你想检查存在,你可以['Yes', 'No'] in A:
In [1]: A = [['Yes', 'No'], ['Yes', 'Idontknow'], ['No', 'Yes'], ['No', 'Idontknow']]
In [2]: ['Yes', 'No'] in A
Out[2]: True
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
为下一个案例尝试:
In [3]: A = [['Yes', 'lala', 'No'], ['Yes', 'lala', 'Idontknow'], ['No', 'lala', 'Yes'], ['No', 'lala', 'Idontknow']]
In [4]: any(i[0]=='Yes' and i[2] == 'No' for i in A)
Out[4]: True
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
或者你可以定义一个小函数:
In [5]: def want_to_know(l,item):
...: for i in l:
...: if i[0] == item[0] and i[2] == item[2]:
...: return True
...: return False
In [6]: want_to_know(A,['Yes', 'xxx', 'No'])
Out[6]: True
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
any(i[0]=='Yes' and i[2] == 'No' for i in A*10000) 实际上似乎比转换本身快10倍.
In [8]: %timeit any({(x[0],x[-1]) == ('Yes','No') for x in A*10000})
100 loops, best of 3: 14 ms per loop
In [9]: % timeit {tuple([x[0],x[-1]]) for x in A*10000}
10 loops, best of 3: 33.4 ms per loop
In [10]: %timeit any(i[0]=='Yes' and i[2] == 'No' for i in A*10000)
1000 loops, best of 3: 334 us per loop
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
8534 次 |
| 最近记录: |