不知道这是可能的,但我希望能够定义一个类型转换的元组,如:[number, string, undefined, number]对[number, string, number](即过滤掉undefined)。
我想到了这样的事情:
type FilterUndefined<T extends any[]> = {
[i in keyof T]: T[i] extends undefined ? /* nothing? */ : T[i];
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
可悲的是,我很确定没有办法实现这一目标。
Prz*_*ert 14
得到它了!但是它需要很多递归魔术:
type PrependTuple<A, T extends Array<any>> =
A extends undefined ? T :
(((a: A, ...b: T) => void) extends (...a: infer I) => void ? I : [])
type RemoveFirstFromTuple<T extends any[]> =
T['length'] extends 0 ? undefined :
(((...b: T) => void) extends (a, ...b: infer I) => void ? I : [])
type FirstFromTuple<T extends any[]> =
T['length'] extends 0 ? undefined : T[0]
type NumberToTuple<N extends number, L extends Array<any> = []> = {
true: L;
false: NumberToTuple<N, PrependTuple<1, L>>;
}[L['length'] extends N ? "true" : "false"];
type Decrease<I extends number> = RemoveFirstFromTuple<NumberToTuple<I>>['length']
type H = Decrease<4>
type Iter<N extends number, Items extends any[], L extends Array<any> = []> = {
true: L;
false: Iter<FirstFromTuple<Items> extends undefined ? Decrease<N> : N, RemoveFirstFromTuple<Items>, PrependTuple<FirstFromTuple<Items>, L>>;
}[L["length"] extends N ? "true" : "false"];
type FilterUndefined<T extends any[]> = Iter<T['length'], T>
type I = [number, string, undefined, number];
type R = FilterUndefined<I>
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
怎么运行的:
PrependToTuple是一种util,它接受项A和列表T,并在A未定义时将其添加到第一位。PrependToTuple<undefined, []> => [],PrependToTuple<undefined, [number]> => [number]
RemoveFirstFromTuple 我以同样的方式工作漂亮的马赫
NumberToTuple递归检查最终元组的长度是否为N,否则,他将1加到递归调用中。创建Decrease实用程序需要此实用程序。
最重要的z Iter就像递归循环一样,当最后一个元组的长度是它的return的N大小,但是当我们尝试执行add时,它的长度不会增加,因此当我们必须减小N时。InputOutputPrependToTupleundefinedIter<FirstFromTuple<Items> extends undefined
for*_*d04 14
元组的过滤操作现在正式成为可能:
type FilterUndefined<T extends unknown[]> = T extends [] ? [] :
T extends [infer H, ...infer R] ?
H extends undefined ? FilterUndefined<R> : [H, ...FilterUndefined<R>] : T
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
让我们做一些测试来检查它是否按预期工作:
type T1 = FilterUndefined<[number, string, undefined, number]>
// [number, string, number]
type T2 = FilterUndefined<[1, undefined, 2]> // [1, 2]
type T3 = FilterUndefined<[undefined, 2]> // [2]
type T4 = FilterUndefined<[2, undefined]> // [2]
type T5 = FilterUndefined<[undefined, undefined, 2]> // [2]
type T6 = FilterUndefined<[undefined]> // []
type T7 = FilterUndefined<[]> // []
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
补充回答:
ford04 的答案中方法的扩展允许我们创建一个“拼接器”实用程序类型,它可以删除任意索引处的值(以防有人在寻找类型安全的解决方案时发现它splice)。
undefined这涉及创建一个实用程序类型,该实用程序类型将从给定的元组和索引生成元组:
type UndefIndex<T extends any[], I extends number> = {
[ P in keyof T ] : P extends Exclude<keyof T, keyof any[]> ? P extends `${I}` ? undefined : T[P] : T[P]
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
UndefIndex那么这只是组合和类型的问题FilterUndefined:
type FilterUndefined<T extends any[]> = T extends [] ? [] :
T extends [infer H, ...infer R] ?
H extends undefined ? FilterUndefined<R> : [H, ...FilterUndefined<R>] : T;
type SpliceTuple<T extends any[], I extends number> = FilterUndefined<UndefIndex<T, I>>;
type a = SpliceTuple<[1,2,3], 0>; //[2,3]
type b = SpliceTuple<[1,2,3], 1>; //[1,3]
type c = SpliceTuple<[1,2,3], 2>; //[1,2]
type d = SpliceTuple<[1,2,3], 3>; //[1,2,3]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
739 次 |
| 最近记录: |