如何在 GitHub 存储库上“镜像”？

Question

我注意到https://github.com/apache/ant说“从 git://git.apache.org/ant.git 镜像”（带有链接），我也想这样做。

https://exyr.org/2011/git-mirrors/似乎是对一般技术（基本上是一个 cron 工作）的好文章，但我遇到了一些奇怪的错误，我没有看到“镜像来自” https://github.com/pdurbin/openscholar（目的地）。我希望镜像的来源是https://github.com/openscholar/openscholar

这是我看到的（修剪后的）输出：

murphy:~ pdurbin$ cd /tmp
murphy:tmp pdurbin$ git clone --mirror https://github.com/openscholar/openscholar.git
Cloning into bare repository 'openscholar.git'...
remote: Counting objects: 167069, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (51806/51806), done.
remote: Total 167069 (delta 112936), reused 166304 (delta 112255)
Receiving objects: 100% (167069/167069), 82.77 MiB | 650 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (112936/112936), done.
murphy:tmp pdurbin$ cd openscholar.git
murphy:openscholar.git pdurbin$ git remote add github git@github.com:pdurbin/openscholar.git
murphy:openscholar.git pdurbin$ git fetch -q && git push -q --mirror github
remote: error: hook declined to update refs/pull/1001/head
remote: error: hook declined to update refs/pull/1001/merge
(snip)
remote: error: hook declined to update refs/pull/957/head
remote: error: hook declined to update refs/pull/957/merge
To git@github.com:pdurbin/openscholar.git
 * [new branch]      1017 -> 1017
(snip)
 * [new branch]      origin/SCHOLAR-3.x-make-1072 -> origin/SCHOLAR-3.x-make-1072
 * [new tag]         SCHOLAR-2-0-BETA1 -> SCHOLAR-2-0-BETA1
(snip)
 * [new tag]         SCHOLAR-3.1.6 -> SCHOLAR-3.1.6
 ! [remote rejected] refs/pull/1001/head -> refs/pull/1001/head (hook declined)
 ! [remote rejected] refs/pull/1001/merge -> refs/pull/1001/merge (hook declined)
(snip)
 ! [remote rejected] refs/pull/957/head -> refs/pull/957/head (hook declined)
 ! [remote rejected] refs/pull/957/merge -> refs/pull/957/merge (hook declined)
error: failed to push some refs to 'git@github.com:pdurbin/openscholar.git'
murphy:openscholar.git pdurbin$ 

Answer 1

我相信 ceejayoz 关于 GitHub 员工需要帮助的评论是正确的。他们建议简单地设置一个占位符，我在https://github.com/iqss/openscholar上这样做了

它没有我最初寻找的“镜像”，但我们可以没有它。