此查询获取您关注的人创建的帖子列表。您可以关注无限数量的人,但大多数人关注 < 1000 人。
使用这种查询方式,明显的优化是缓存"Post"id,但不幸的是我现在没有时间这样做。
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT
"Post"."id",
"Post"."actionId",
"Post"."commentCount",
...
FROM
"Posts" AS "Post"
INNER JOIN "Users" AS "user" ON "Post"."userId" = "user"."id"
LEFT OUTER JOIN "ActivityLogs" AS "activityLog" ON "Post"."activityLogId" = "activityLog"."id"
LEFT OUTER JOIN "WeightLogs" AS "weightLog" ON "Post"."weightLogId" = "weightLog"."id"
LEFT OUTER JOIN "Workouts" AS "workout" ON "Post"."workoutId" = "workout"."id"
LEFT OUTER JOIN "WorkoutLogs" AS "workoutLog" ON "Post"."workoutLogId" = "workoutLog"."id"
LEFT OUTER JOIN "Workouts" AS "workoutLog.workout" ON "workoutLog"."workoutId" = "workoutLog.workout"."id"
WHERE
"Post"."userId" IN …Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud) postgresql performance index optimization postgresql-performance
我对索引列的查询速度非常慢。鉴于查询
SELECT *
FROM orders
WHERE shop_id = 3828
ORDER BY updated_at desc
LIMIT 1
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
explain analyze 回来:
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=0.43..594.45 rows=1 width=175) (actual time=202106.830..202106.831 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Index Scan Backward using index_orders_on_updated_at on orders (cost=0.43..267901.54 rows=451 width=175) (actual time=202106.827..202106.827 rows=1 loops=1)
Filter: (shop_id = 3828)
Rows Removed by Filter: 1604818
Planning time: 98.579 ms
Execution time: 202127.514 ms
(6 rows)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
表说明为:
Table "public.orders"
Column | Type | Modifiers
--------------------+-----------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------
id | integer | not null default nextval('orders_id_seq'::regclass) …Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud) performance ×2
postgresql ×2
amazon-rds ×1
index ×1
index-tuning ×1
optimization ×1
order-by ×1